Yep. Citizens march on the gov's mansion and prominently display her from a lamppost. It could be done in a few hours. Is that fast enough?Can they fast track an impeachment?
Yep. Citizens march on the gov's mansion and prominently display her from a lamppost. It could be done in a few hours. Is that fast enough?Can they fast track an impeachment?
Right out of the history books.Yep. Citizens march on the gov's mansion and prominently display her from a lamppost. It could be done in a few hours. Is that fast enough?
She ended immunity for ALL GOVERNMENT employees who violate civil rights. This INCLUDES the Govnor herself. She opened herself fully and to be directly sued as an individual for violating the rights of the people when she does this. Sue her ass off for deprivation of rights against the people of NM.
No need to be just NM citizens. If you were planning to visit the affected area during that time you would have standing to sue so long as you were planning on carrying and were properly licensed.She ended immunity for ALL GOVERNMENT employees who violate civil rights. This INCLUDES the Govnor herself. She opened herself fully and to be directly sued as an individual for violating the rights of the people when she does this. Sue her ass off for deprivation of rights against the people of NM.
So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?Per usual, LEO exemption and they know that it's unconstitutional but are prepared to waste your $$ anyway.
If the governor wants to disarm citizens then yes. Very much so. Government agents aren't special.So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?
Yeah, okIf the governor wants to disarm citizens then yes. Very much so. Government agents aren't special.
Sure. When law officers are unarmed, they will understand what ordinary citizens are living with. Suddenly that dental plan just isn't worth it.So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?
So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?
Sorry. We see eye to eye on a lot. If guns are the problem, and disarming lawful carry is the answer, then it should absolutely apply to LEO. Stats show LEO commit crime at a statistically significantly higher rate than permit holders. That’s if we follow the logic.So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?
Of course not!!!! LEO other govt lackeys and other groups the govt thinks are special should be treated differently and better than the rest of us. Clearly the constitution makes a carve out that says those who enforce the laws of the state are superior to the people. Somewhere in Article 2 I think.So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?
I’m definitely not in favor of that. We need good men and women doing the job.Let's defund them.
Let's defund them.
So you are all for unarmed cops answering calls?