So what is the state’s motive for maintaining charges against her?
So what is the state’s motive for maintaining charges against her?
So she's facing charges for the one firearm that was missing parts? Completely unconstitutional. None if the cops posing for that picture should feel proud about this.
Not one officer in the pic has an ounce of pride.
My guess is the single real gun wasn't rendered inoperable by ATF regulations so therefore one charge might still be valid?So what is the state’s motive for maintaining charges against her?