ivzarleinad
Member
- Jun 6, 2017
- 19
I'm sorry - maybe this is a silly question but what is an IP?
I'm sorry - maybe this is a silly question but what is an IP?
I'm sorry - maybe this is a silly question but what is an IP?
That's because the PS90s on the roster were SBRs back when the MSP decided they needed to be on the roster. No one's selling them as real pistols.FYI, the PS90 is on the handgun roster.
And, as I understand, some have been sold as pistols post 2013.
And yes, MD Not Disapproved the 77r.
That's because the PS90s on the roster were SBRs back when the MSP decided they needed to be on the roster. No one's selling them as real pistols.
Interesting, so it has two butt stocks; The original and the second folding stock which makes it Maryland legal.
I'm sure it won't be long before some schmuck writes a letter asking the MSP/ATF if shouldering this firearm with the stock folded; thus in a <29" OAL configuration, does that reclassify the firearm as a banned Maryland assault weapon. I'm sure Frosh-hole will happily respond with a vague and confusing opinion.
I'd like to see a picture of this mythical PS90 pistol. Because, no, I still don't believe it.NO ONE?????
Are you SURE?
Because you are incorrect.
And as I stated, MSP Not Disapproved the 77r.
I'd like to see a picture of this mythical PS90 pistol. Because, no, I still don't believe it.
I recall that thread, now that you bring it up. You would be going to federal jail if you tried to put a short barrel on a PS90 without a stamp, regardless of what the state of MD would do. And, bluntly, I think you'd be fined or going to jail in MD if you sold a factory PS90 with a 16" barrel to someone and the MSP noticed you did so. It has a stock. It has a 16"barrel. It's a rifle.If it is sold as a pistol, not SBR, then there is no minimum length.
Hmm, I wonder if a PS90 that was sold and approved (Not Disapproved) by MSP can have the short barrel installed without SBR paperwork, as it is not a rifle.
You can believe what you want to believe, but it has been done. It was even mentioned in a thread on MDS.
I am not going to show you a copy of the 77r, for obvious reasons. But I know it was done, and have held the firearm.
I recall that thread, now that you bring it up. You would be going to federal jail if you tried to put a short barrel on a PS90 without a stamp, regardless of what the state of MD would do. And, bluntly, I think you'd be fined or going to jail in MD if you sold a factory PS90 with a 16" barrel to someone and the MSP noticed you did so. It has a stock. It has a 16"barrel. It's a rifle.
Anybody can slip something past the MSP once. That doesn't make it precedent, that makes it "lucky". The irony here is that I actually agree the MSP is misinterpreting the law, and that the OAL test shouldn't apply to SBRs, and that they should have to have a 77r to transfer. But that is just not how the state is currently interpreting things.