SB 728 - Public Safety - Licensed Firearms Dealers- Background Checks

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ShallNotInfringe

    Lil Firecracker
    Feb 17, 2013
    8,554
    Public Safety – Licensed Firearms Dealers – Background Checks

    FOR the purpose of authorizing, before a certain date, a certain licensed firearm dealer to conditionally sell, rent, or transfer a firearm to a firearm applicant under certain circumstances; prohibiting the licensee from selling, renting, or transferring the firearm under certain circumstances; requiring the licensee to make certain notifications under certain circumstances; authorizing a law enforcement agency to confiscate a certain firearm under certain circumstances; providing for the termination of this Act; and generally relating to licensed firearm dealers.

    Bill text is here: http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2014RS/bills/sb/sb0728f.pdf

    A few things about this bill bother me:
    - use of the term "conditional" - current law states that the Secretary of Police has 7 days to DISAPPROVE a regulated purchase. Reference: Maryland Code, Public Safety 5-122

    This bill introduces the notion of a "conditional" release until... See next item

    There is a "waiting period" in place that coincides with this timeframe.

    This also creates a limbo state for a purchase. The state had their 7 days to DISAPPROVE.

    - use of the term "approve" as in " On receipt of notice that the Secretary has approved the application..." and throughout the bill.

    Through the background check process, the state may find a condition that prevents a person from receiving the firearm, thereby creating a DISAPPROVE condition. Having the state APPROVE a purchase is a misnomer, they in fact may NOT DISAPPROVE it based on not finding any cause to prevent the transfer.

    Hearing for this is on the Senate Gun Bill Day agenda 2/26... http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=144312
     

    Mr H

    Unincited Co-Conservative
    Looks like the intent of this is to turn MD into a Point-of-Sale approval state, and do away with the 77R.

    The MSP is still involved for anything other than a "proceed", and would still do their 17million-point background check. But, the timeframes there seem fuzzy.

    But, it doesn't do anything about the HQL, and notice that it's only a 2-year change to the law. HUH???
     

    Lou45

    R.I.P.
    Jun 29, 2010
    12,048
    Carroll County
    The phrases "certain circumstances" and "certain notifications" need to be defined as to "EXACTLY" what they are. If it's defined in the bill itself (link), I didn't open it.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    Could the two year provision be simply to help get it to pass, so later our side can say "see, this is how normal states do it, and nothing happened"?
     

    dblas

    Past President, MSI
    MDS Supporter
    Apr 6, 2011
    13,134
    It is a pseudo half step to Point of sale status. What this bill attempts, is to provide the ability of the FFL to contact NICS at the end of the 7 days, in the event that MSP gets backlogged.

    This is a measured response to the the news about the 50+ firearms (out of How many?) that had to be chased down by MSP after they were released on the 8th day before MSP review was complete.

    Personally, I prefer HB 818, which would make MD a true Point of Sale State.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,027
    Messages
    7,305,370
    Members
    33,560
    Latest member
    JackW

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom