Ramirez' bill was withdrawn in judicial proceedings committee due to an unfavorable report ... which may be a symptom of the reason that he's leaving the Senate and running for SA in PG County.
Hopefully this one gets an unfavorable report as well
Ramirez' bill was withdrawn in judicial proceedings committee due to an unfavorable report ... which may be a symptom of the reason that he's leaving the Senate and running for SA in PG County.
Did anybody else notice the part claiming possession of the rapid fire device or a magazine of greater than 10 rounds being a crime?
A PERSON MAY NOT: 3
(1) TRANSPORT A RAPID FIRE TRIGGER ACTIVATOR INTO THE STATE; 4 OR 5
(2) MANUFACTURE, POSSESS, SELL, OFFER TO SELL, TRANSFER, 6 PURCHASE, OR RECEIVE A RAPID FIRE TRIGGER ACTIVATOR.
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, a person who violates this 9 subtitle is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not 10 exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both.
Did anybody else notice the part claiming possession of the rapid fire device or a magazine of greater than 10 rounds being a crime?
Huh? Where’s the last one. Only thing I see about POSESSION in relation to mag capacity is use in the commission of a felony of a mag over 10 rounds in capacity violates the AWB.
Yep, thought that already existed? So just make sure to commit a felony with a magazine of 10rds or less in a Mini 14..
Did anybody else notice the part claiming possession of the rapid fire device or a magazine of greater than 10 rounds being a crime?
Look at 4-305.1:
and the penalty is 4-306
yes, this will make possession a felony as I read it.
using it in a felony or crime of violence is an extra penalty
Ramirez' bill was withdrawn in judicial proceedings committee due to an unfavorable report ... which may be a symptom of the reason that he's leaving the Senate and running for SA in PG County.
So if someone bought an AR with a rate of fire "accelerator" installed from the factory, this would criminalize that weapon and force the end user to modify their weapon from the factory designed and tested configuration or become a felon. I wonder if these lawmakers really want to make the state liable for forcing individuals to modify their firearm's trigger mechanisms to comply with state law. One accidental discharge that kills someone could come back on the state.
They...simply...don't...care. It's political grandstanding to throw (vegan) meat to their base before the 2018 elections.
Then we need to get them to admit to it on record when this bill is bring heard. It would be damning evidence in any court case and it should scare them.
Yup. All I can say is good luck to them trying to confiscate them all. The civil disobedience in not complying with this law if it passes will be huge.
There will be no civil disobedience. We can barely get a dozen people for MTFU Mondays!
Interesting... they define this as a device that accelerates "beyond the standard rate of fire". So if a gun is designed and built and delivered with a bump stock then the "standard rate" of fire for that firearm is whatever you can achieve with the purchased weapon.