SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

[Derek]

Who got kicked out?

 

[welder516]

Ban pills lady

 

[hodgepodge]

The room is full of 2A folks with little room for the mommies.

 

[MikeSP]

SB 1 has been rewritten

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/919090464752295978/1072601773237350531/SB_1_Unofficial_Copy_020723.pdf

We need some speed readers to digest that not on a phone browser…

 

[MikeSP]

The room is full of 2A folks with little room for the mommies.

Come on be a gentleman.

 

[Stoveman]

We need some speed readers to digest that not on a phone browser…

 

[Stoveman]

100' BS is gone.

 

[SigNerd]

Did I see some red shirt mommies being asked to leave?

Because of overcrowding the SP officer asked people standing at the door if they were testifying on the current bill or later ones. If later he asked them to wait outside the room.

 

[Stoveman]

We need some speed readers to digest that not on a phone browser…

While the 100' requirement is gone it still lists places that would be prohibited and describes what would be a new process to get a permit which includes 4 references and a face to face with the Secretary of the MSP.

 

[teratos]

While the 100' requirement is gone it still lists places that would be prohibited and describes what would be a new process to get a permit which includes 4 references and a face to face with the Secretary of the MSP.

Lol. Flies in the face of Bruen. Must be frustrating when your pud is small and limp.

 

[Metaterra]

And the required references have to write little assessments of your propensity to violence, etc. It also adds rest stops to prohibited places along with every possible location they could think of. Just reading this revised crap raised my blood pressure.

 

[sleev-les]

While the 100' requirement is gone it still lists places that would be prohibited and describes what would be a new process to get a permit which includes 4 references and a face to face with the Secretary of the MSP.

More absurdity from the MGA. None of this should fly once challenged in court. Just sickening we have to do this dance every year from these clown.

 

[GTOGUNNER]

This new, or edited bill is way worse. Unspeakable unlawful anti Bruen totally.. they must have done this as a joke. No way. don't even bother reading it you will get pissed.

 

[JollyPedro]

It also says our permits now are no good since we didn’t meet these new rules when we got them?

 

[djcerna]

SB1 is up!

 

[Bertfish]

It also says our permits now are no good since we didn’t meet these new rules when we got them?

Where do you see that

 

[hdatontodo]

While the 100' requirement is gone it still lists places that would be prohibited and describes what would be a new process to get a permit which includes 4 references and a face to face with the Secretary of the MSP.

Regarding personal references / moral character, this 2022 page mentions 1st and 2nd amendment conflicts (for another location.)

State Attorney General Suggests Considering Applicants' Ideological Viewpoints in Denying Carry Licenses

Friday, the day after the New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen Supreme Court decision, the California Attorney General...

reason.com

 

[Reezie]

serious question


Has Jeff hit puberty yet?

 

[jc1240]

And the required references have to write little assessments of your propensity to violence, etc. It also adds rest stops to prohibited places along with every possible location they could think of. Just reading this revised crap raised my blood pressure.

They must have read that debate thread from a month or so ago.

 

[Deep Lurker]

There are no sensitive places, only sensitive people.

Places don’t have senses.