SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

[Sundazes]

This is a complete circle jerk...

 

[Some Guy]

This is a complete circle jerk...

Indeed

 

[Metaterra]

This is a complete circle jerk...

Hey! We are discussing the windblower amendment. have some respect.

 

[Some Guy]

Listening to these lying cowards is giving me a literal headache.

 

[shershot99]

It’s quite clear Smith wants this bill passed. We better get our money ready for the courts cause that’s what’s going to happen. We need to get an immediate injunction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Derek]

Talk about just ramming something... anything through!

 

[Some Guy]

We reiterate that the standard for applying the Second Amendment is as follows:

When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.

The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only then may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.”

 

[Derek]

Willie sure is proud of his Clinton quote.

 

[Some Guy]

Plain text meaning. They know this. They are willfully ignoring it. Liars.

 

[Derek]

I'm pretty sure Mary James is casting a spell...

 

[Derek]

... or trying out for a R.E.M. music video.

 

[Some Guy]

... or trying out for a R.E.M. music video.

I bet video.

 

[Deep Lurker]

Plain text meaning. They know this. They are willfully ignoring it. Liars.

This sham today is only for the benefit of the Mommie Demandapotamuses and keeping their campaign cash and door knocking going for the liars‘ re-election.

And they only door-knock in their own “nice“ neighborhoods.

 

[Some Guy]

No, Waldstreicher. Here's the true source of analysis:

We reiterate that the standard for applying the Second Amendment is as follows:

When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.

The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only then may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.”

 

[Derek]

Mommie Demandapotamuses

 

[Metaterra]

Oh, Waldo thinks this is written in compliance with Thomas's opinion. What a sh*thead.

 

[Some Guy]

I hope all of Waldstreicher's is being recorded. It'll play well in court.

 

[Odarlin1]

Bottom line from the 2A community should be NO. No. NO. There is no compromise on the 2A and Bruen makes that clear. No. No. No. We will not compromise. We are not going to play nice here. It gets us nowhere. Once this passes, it will only get worse next year.

 

[Park ranger]

Bottom line from the 2A community should be NO. No. NO. There is no compromise on the 2A and Bruen makes that clear. No. No. No. We will not compromise. We are not going to play nice here. It gets us nowhere.

Amen

 

[Derek]

No time or place outside your home: that's what wally wants!