SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

[RFBfromDE]

Bottom line from the 2A community should be NO. No. NO. There is no compromise on the 2A and Bruen makes that clear. No. No. No. We will not compromise. We are not going to play nice here. It gets us nowhere. Once this passes, it will only get worse next year.

Never interrupt your opponent when they are busy making a mistake


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes and yes.

 

[Derek]

GO WESTIE!

 

[Some Guy]

West is swinging that axe. Go man. Go!

 

[teratos]

Can someone ask Mark P to just tell these fools we are still going to sue for an immediate injunction anyway? They need to realize this isn’t going to stand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, they don't need any warning

 

[Slumy__57]

So now applying for a liquor license automatically = being decidedly against conceal carry on your premises? What a dumb comment.

 

[Some Guy]

West is doing GREAT. Love this guy.

 

[Derek]

So now applying for a liquor license automatically = being decidedly against conceal carry on your premises? What a dumb comment.

They made that choice...before we made that law.

 

[Odarlin1]

West is doing GREAT. Love this guy.

My favorite is Folden. West is doing a good job, however.

 

[Abuck]

Can someone ask Mark P to just tell these fools we are still going to sue for an immediate injunction anyway? They need to realize this isn’t going to stand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t know the who’s who of your legislators, but the older gentleman just did tell them that’s what’s going to happen basically. Then there was a comment about a statement from the AG to be read. That should be a real treat.

 

[Bertfish]

Waldstrikkker is really tossing a word salad in trying to justify this made up shit

 

[Some Guy]

Policy does not equal law. Waldstreicher is such a liar. He knows that these places are seat of government and/or have police located there. I don't give a shit if he "rejects" places or not. Law is law. Policy is fantasy.

 

[Derek]

Policy does not equal law. Waldstreicher is such a liar. He knows that these places are seat of government and/or have police located there. I don't give a shit if he "rejects" places or not. Law is law. Policy is fantasy.

But you have to say it in his valley girl accent.

 

[Deep Lurker]

Still would rather see the rhetorical enfilade of return fire we saw at the 2/6 bill hearing, the day the liars lost.

Unfortunately this de-tuned “exchange“ during the voting session is part of the MGA scam.

Our Constitutional rights are always up for sale, and their show must go on as the Chairman clearly stated today.

 

[Abuck]

Here in PA we can carry in polling places, even open carry. I’ve carried in every election the last 30+ years. Imagine that, being able to exercise several of your constitutional rights, while you participate in the election process of those that will govern you.

 

[djcerna]

Waldstreicher is close to crying trying to explain.

 

[Derek]

He said himself before, this WAS in response to the Bruen descision!

 

[Some Guy]

They are absolutely passing this in spite of Bruen. The Chair just said an hour ago he wished we had a different supreme court. These people are such liars.

 

[shershot99]

Waldstreicher is a tyrant. Period.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Some Guy]

What was Waldstreicher's third fanciful and unconstitutional criteria?

1. Heightened emotions
2. Diminished capacities
3. ?
4. Comparative time-space burden

What was the third one?

 

[Biggfoot44]

No, they don't need any warning

They don't need any Repeat warning , Mark already told them at the Hearings .