SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Sunrise

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2020
    5,460
    Capital Region
    Wes Moore is not signing that piece of crap bill, best to ignore it and let it roll in. That way good or bad he can distance himself from it.

    We all know when it goes in effect more people will die and the dying won't somehow stop like the dumb azzes that voted it in.
    Barry O Moore has presidential aspirations and will take over ruining whatever is left of America
    It'd be one thing if Gov. Moore remained silent or stalled, but he just publicly announced he would sign it. He wants to own this:

    When talking about violent crime, the first-term governor said illegal firearms were part of the problem, though he said he doesn’t think there needs to be a conversation about only tackling one of the concerns when it comes to weapons.

    “There’s no reason for people to bring firearms into hospitals, and churches and schools,” Moore said, adding tackling the violence problem can be an “all of the above” approach.

    “We’ve got to address the issue of the guns that continue to flood our neighborhoods,” he added.

     

    welder516

    Deplorable Welder
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2013
    27,561
    Underground Bunker
    It'd be one thing if Gov. Moore remained silent or stalled, but he just publicly announced he would sign it. He wants to own this:

    When talking about violent crime, the first-term governor said illegal firearms were part of the problem, though he said he doesn’t think there needs to be a conversation about only tackling one of the concerns when it comes to weapons.

    “There’s no reason for people to bring firearms into hospitals, and churches and schools,” Moore said, adding tackling the violence problem can be an “all of the above” approach.

    “We’ve got to address the issue of the guns that continue to flood our neighborhoods,” he added.
    Well than, his political reasons i don't understand but he knows what he is looking for. He is wrong about all of it, but really it does not matter Oprah and the likes will support him to the highest office. BHO 2.0
    We are in evil times.
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,716
    White Marsh, MD
    It'd be one thing if Gov. Moore remained silent or stalled, but he just publicly announced he would sign it. He wants to own this:

    When talking about violent crime, the first-term governor said illegal firearms were part of the problem, though he said he doesn’t think there needs to be a conversation about only tackling one of the concerns when it comes to weapons.

    “There’s no reason for people to bring firearms into hospitals, and churches and schools,” Moore said, adding tackling the violence problem can be an “all of the above” approach.

    “We’ve got to address the issue of the guns that continue to flood our neighborhoods,” he added.

    Anthony Brown was also certain he'd be Governor one day too.
     

    Sunrise

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2020
    5,460
    Capital Region
    I agree... he is not afraid to have his name on this... even if it gets overturned, it is worth its weight in gold in virtue signaling and Bloomberg/Soros funding.
    Yup. There's always more money in the grift.

    "We tried but the system failed us again. Send us more money."
     

    Some Guy

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 26, 2017
    1,044

    jbrown50

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 18, 2014
    3,474
    DC
    I agree... he is not afraid to have his name on this... even if it gets overturned, it is worth its weight in gold in virtue signaling and Bloomberg/Soros funding.
    Gov. Moore requested and took his oath to office on two bibles, one his preacher grandfather's, the other formally belonging to Frederick Douglas. I doubt Frederick Douglas would approve of how he's bowing to Bloomberg/Soros money. Of course that would apply to AG Brown and all of the other MGA Democrats as well.
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,716
    White Marsh, MD
    Gov. Moore requested and took his oath to office on two bibles, one his preacher grandfather's, the other formally belonging to Frederick Douglas. I doubt Frederick Douglas would approve of how he's bowing to Bloomberg/Soros money. Of course that would apply to AG Brown and all of the other MGA Democrats as well.
    Frederick Douglass and all other minorities were the precise targets of early gun control. Guess Moore is a racist
     

    Trbo6gn

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 30, 2011
    2,806
    Harford Co.
    I saw Wes Moore during the Towson Independence day parade last year when he was campaigning. I'm 95% sure he was carrying while walking in the parade. He was printing so much that i even made a comment to my fiance about it.
     

    Some Guy

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 26, 2017
    1,044
    Gov. Moore requested and took his oath to office on two bibles, one his preacher grandfather's, the other formally belonging to Frederick Douglas. I doubt Frederick Douglas would approve of how he's bowing to Bloomberg/Soros money. Of course that would apply to AG Brown and all of the other MGA Democrats as well.
    Good snippet about Douglas in this article from several years ago, and as related to the McDonald court case:


    1681311334930.png
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Then how can Wal Mart sell weapons

    so if most brick and mortar stores don't post CC OK they will have to go out of business?
    Walmart can sell guns because they are the "owner" of the building. Presumably, they are also ok with the customer taking possession and walking out the door and have thus given permission for that purpose
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,933
    Messages
    7,301,412
    Members
    33,540
    Latest member
    lsmitty67

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom