SB1 - Injunctive relief is provided for private property, locations that sell alcohol, and public demonstrations.

[johnkn]

Thanks, I was curious whether the injunction impacted that current law... I AM a MSI member....

.

 

[Phoenix_1295]

Thanks, I was curious whether the injunction impacted that current law... I'm a MSI member....

 

[Biggfoot44]

Thanks, I was curious whether the injunction impacted that current law... I'm a MSI member....

.

The main body of the case might , but not affected by the Injunction .

 

[kennyd]

CMC
(Concealed means Concealed)

 

[Crazytrain]

I have no idea what you are trying to say with that.....

I'm asking about CCing with a MD permit in a Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration parking lot where the outdoor emissions kiosk is.....


.

What he was trying to say was ... it's not OK legally. However, if you aren't going through a metal detector and can conceal, then you have a choice to make. What is more important to you. 1) avoiding legal risk by going unarmed while opening yourself up to greater risk of harm from bad guys or 2) Accepting legal risk while keeping the tools at hand to protect yourself from bad guys. There's more to it, as well. Do you comply with clearly unconstitutional and immoral government orders, or do you wish to take a moral stand? Who are you more afraid of? The state or the thugs (although, it could be argued they are often one and the same).

Some folks here will do all the WWNC, CMC, EBMD, etc... thing for asking the questions. Really, I feel it isn't unreasonable to want to know what the law is. What you do with that information is up to you.

You are a free man. Make the decision that works best for you. They both have consequences.

 

[Bob A]

What he was trying to say was ... it's not OK legally. However, if you aren't going through a metal detector and can conceal, then you have a choice to make. What is more important to you. 1) avoiding legal risk by going unarmed while opening yourself up to greater risk of harm from bad guys or 2) Accepting legal risk while keeping the tools at hand to protect yourself from bad guys. There's more to it, as well. Do you comply with clearly unconstitutional and immoral government orders, or do you wish to take a moral stand? Who are you more afraid of? The state or the thugs (although, it could be argued they are often one and the same).

Some folks here will do all the WWNC, CMC, EBMD, etc... thing for asking the questions. Really, I feel it isn't unreasonable to want to know what the law is. What you do with that information is up to you.

You are a free man. Make the decision that works best for you. They both have consequences.

Well expressed ^^^ !

 

[Phoenix_1295]

Thanks, I was curious whether the injunction impacted that current law... I'm a MSI member....

.

It can be a little confusing because Criminal Law title 4, sub-title 1, section 4-111 references the prohibition being limited to government buildings, but COMAR prohibits on the property and defines “property” as “State public buildings, improvements, grounds, and multiservice centers under the jurisdiction of the Department of General Services” which would include the surrounding property.

It is noted that COMAR references “carry”, not “possess”, so it would seem that if it is secured in a vehicle and not on a person, that would not violate COMAR, however, IANAL.

 

[theo]

I saw yesterday MSI posted the case notes for the injunction and each sides reply. From how I read it, the state is NOT appealing the injunction. This is a huge win. The state must know they are going to lose because it is unconstitutional. Now we just have to wait for it to run its course through the courts. I hope I read it correctly as I am not a lawyer (?).

 

[rambling_one]

Sign in Chick-fil-A in Bowie has a no firearms or other weapons sign inside facility. They also have armed security.

 

[eruby]

 

[SigNerd]

Sign in Chick-fil-A in Bowie has a no firearms or other weapons sign inside facility. They also have armed security.

Good for them. It means nothing unless they're wanding you (or happen to notice you're carrying) and tell you to leave.

That said, there are better chicken sandwiches to be had.

 

[Doctor_M]

View attachment 436431

LOL... This should be an MDS tee-shirt.

 

[Georges2nd]

LOL... This should be an MDS tee-shirt.

We can raise money for our 2nd amendment case to supreme court

 

[Biggfoot44]

Poster for the gun room wall !

 

[thomfantomas]

I saw yesterday MSI posted the case notes for the injunction and each sides reply. From how I read it, the state is NOT appealing the injunction. This is a huge win. The state must know they are going to lose because it is unconstitutional. Now we just have to wait for it to run its course through the courts. I hope I read it correctly as I am not a lawyer (?).

It is and they know it is.

After this is over,I think a wise lawsuit is to remove "duty to retreat" from the legal clause!

 

[Ponder_MD]

View attachment 436431

 

[Muleskinner]

View attachment 436431

THIS^^^^

 

[Threeband]

View attachment 436431

Where is that? I wouldn't want to accidently give them any business.

 

[ToneGrail]

Sign in Chick-fil-A in Bowie has a no firearms or other weapons sign inside facility. They also have armed security.

After being boycotted by the woke crowd for chick fil a's religious views on marriage, the gun loving crowd came to their rescue. What a stupid move to alienate the demographic of their remaining customers.

 

[River02]

After being boycotted by the woke crowd for chick fil a's religious views on marriage, the gun loving crowd came to their rescue. What a stupid move to alienate the demographic of their remaining customers.

Yes-- someone needs to "educate" the main office. If the local manager/franchise owner has ultimate control, then they need to be educated.