Frosh isn't AG anymore. He served his purpose, and they will have no problem pushing the issue and making him the fall guy.
An understandable misspelling, considering Zuckerberg's political beliefs and behavior. It is both surprising and sad that he behaves more like Goebbels than the religious Jew he claims to be, considering the history of suffering the Jews have with things like gun control, government tyranny, Nazis, etc.as long as their political bent aligns with Herr Goebbels - oops, I misspelled Zuckerberg there.
Well, there is no interest in concealed carry in Maryland (according to that POS)Frosh isn't AG anymore. He served his purpose, and they will have no problem pushing the issue and making him the fall guy.
Frosh isn't AG anymore. He served his purpose, and they will have no problem pushing the issue and making him the fall guy.
he stated we were "nuts" and that "we were wrong" on the right to carry.Well, there is no interest in concealed carry in Maryland (according to that POS)
Zuck and Waldstreicher come from the same cloth, they actually believe they are doing something to protect the community, when in point of fact, they are making their own tribe (and the other tribes) easier targets for the future Goebbels of the world.An understandable misspelling, considering Zuckerberg's political beliefs and behavior. It is both surprising and sad that he behaves more like Goebbels than the religious Jew he claims to be, considering the history of suffering the Jews have with things like gun control, government tyranny, Nazis, etc.
They aren't really. Or at least I can't comment on Waldstreicher, but he doesn't seem the delusions of grandeur type. Zukerberg DOES have them. Notice his stupid android bowl cut hair? It is literally because he worships Caesar Octavian and styled himself as such.Zuck and Waldstreicher come from the same cloth, they actually believe they are doing something to protect the community, when in point of fact, they are making their own tribe (and the other tribes) easier targets for the future Goebbels of the world.
So I’m going to admit that I’ve changed my perspective a bit now that I’ve watched this video:
I see why anti-gun legislators (e.g., most of MGA) have so little incentive to be afraid.
So here’s an experienced lawyer telling you exactly why that won’t work, and yet you’re advocating for doing exactly the thing you’re complaining about. Spiteful tantrums that won’t fix anything are worse than doing nothing.Who cares if we win. Once Merrick Garland is replaced with a 2A sympathetic AG, we should charge all the Governors who signed these laws into being and all the legislators who voted in favor. We should wait until they are no longer representatives so they have to use their own money to defend themselves. We should weaponize the AG just like the Demonrats have weaponized the FBI, CIA, ATF, Home Land Security and the IRS. We should use tax dollars to hire attorneys to fight these cases.
I get it, though. It’s an emotional response, and strong feelings can overcome logic. Just like the other side passing laws that do exactly what Bruen said wasn’t kosher. A lot of time, money, and energy was put into passing SB1. A “we’ll show you!” passed by people who should know better.So here’s an experienced lawyer telling you exactly why that won’t work, and yet you’re advocating for doing exactly the thing you’re complaining about. Spiteful tantrums that won’t fix anything are worse than doing nothing.
Yes. That’s the empowered but arrested development juvenile left irrationally doing what they always do. Let’s not be them.I get it, though. It’s an emotional response, and strong feelings can overcome logic. Just like the other side passing laws that do exactly what Bruen said wasn’t kosher. A lot of time, money, and energy was put into passing SB1. A “we’ll show you!” passed by people who should know better.
… arrested development …
Yes. That’s the empowered but arrested development juvenile left irrationally doing what they always do. Let’s not be them.
So here’s an experienced lawyer telling you exactly why that won’t work, and yet you’re advocating for doing exactly the thing you’re complaining about. Spiteful tantrums that won’t fix anything are worse than doing nothing.
It won’t hurt them at all if a judge simply throws it out immediately for all the reasons Video Lawyer just spelled out.The first reason is because it is hard to do with a high bar for success. So what might as well try.
The second reason is because of the current AG - I suggested we wait until we can put in a 2A sympathetic AG
Can't remember the 3rd reason.
As I said who cares if we win. If we show the left that we're willing to prosecute them for knowingly violating our rights, it may give them some pause before passing laws like SB1 which so clearly violate our rights. If not, no worries since they will be spending their own money to defend themselves. This will personally hurt them which is an OK result for me.
...A lot of time, money, and energy was put into passing SB1...