Saginaw
Active Member
Why have none of the major news agencies reported the recent mass murder attempt in one of the US territories, Guam, On February 14, 2013 a man drove his car at a high rate of speed on the sidewalk in a heavily populate tourist area and injured 13 Japanese tourist then jumped from his vehicle and started stabbing the injured with a kitchen knife, killing 3 and even stabbed an 8 month old baby.
Why do news organizations, Sen. Feinstein her supporters, and other politicians who would attack our 2nd Amendment rights continue to use Japan as an example of a Country with no violence or murder? Yes it does have less violence from guns because yes, they are banned. However, this does not mean they do not have people with mental issues doing the same thing as people in the US are doing regarding mass or attempted mass killings. There have been many cases of Violence including mass killings in Japan. The sick people there use knives and poison even poisonous gas, they have also used automobiles. Please Stop reporting only half truths. The real problem is mental illness and people with hate and violence in their hearts. Not our Guns!
I hear no cries to ban automobiles or kitchen knives. If this is about safety why are you not calling for limiting cars to one cylinder because speeding is the cause of more deaths in this country than Guns. Why not limit car engines to 40 miles per hour. Some Americans want a car that can go 150 or better and no one questions it. Even though the speed limits max out at 75mph. Driving a car is a privilege and no one is even considering limiting the ability or taking that away from the crazy people we all see zooming down our residential streets. If this is truly about safety, why not?
Once again driving is only a privilege not a GOD Given Right as an American owning Arms is a RIGHT! That is not to be infringed upon!
If someone wants to own a Twenty or more round magazine so they can spend more time at the range shooting targets and less time loading when they are paying for the range time by the hour, why should they not be able too. That is their right! More than your privilege to own a car that can do 100 MPH. Ask yourself why anyone would need a car that can do that? If they go that fast they are breaking the law right? I ask; do you think that is a ridiculous statement? Everyday lately I have heard politicians and Celebrities say why would anyone need a Twenty round or larger magazine? Which question is more ridiculous? In my opinion the later.
Ask yourself when 30 gang members surround your house as in what happen to an elderly lady in Compton California. Then start throwing bottles at your house and tell you can’t live there because your black; please see Attack on family in Compton latest incident in wave of anti-black violence
Jan 25, 2013
Read more at http://www.arcamax.com/currentnews/newsheadlines/s-1269465#HK1kffbjg2lso2cx.99
You deserve to have the right to have a large capacity magazine to protect your home and family.
If you want to go to the range and spend your time shooting rather than loading you deserve to have the right to a large capacity magazine.
Some of you would rather take away a RIGHT of the American people under the guise of safety than address the real problems in this Country.
Our Right to own and bear Arms has kept us safe from tyranny, helps us protect ourselves from home invasions and gangs of roaming thugs.
How as an American can you even suggest taking away one of our Bill of Rights. How long before some politician decides none of them are needed?
The 2nd Amendment protects all the rest!
Let’s focus on why people want to kill and hurt each other and not the ways they do it. Lets help those who need mental help.
In closeing If you take away all guns from civilians like in Japan. it has been demonstrated people that are intent on killing only find different methods and the good people are left to the mercy of these criminals without the means to protect themselfs, just ask the good people of Mexico, their Government does not allow them to own Arms and their people are being terrorized by criminals every day.
God Bless our founding fathers for our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Let us all protect them for freedoms sake!
Why do news organizations, Sen. Feinstein her supporters, and other politicians who would attack our 2nd Amendment rights continue to use Japan as an example of a Country with no violence or murder? Yes it does have less violence from guns because yes, they are banned. However, this does not mean they do not have people with mental issues doing the same thing as people in the US are doing regarding mass or attempted mass killings. There have been many cases of Violence including mass killings in Japan. The sick people there use knives and poison even poisonous gas, they have also used automobiles. Please Stop reporting only half truths. The real problem is mental illness and people with hate and violence in their hearts. Not our Guns!
I hear no cries to ban automobiles or kitchen knives. If this is about safety why are you not calling for limiting cars to one cylinder because speeding is the cause of more deaths in this country than Guns. Why not limit car engines to 40 miles per hour. Some Americans want a car that can go 150 or better and no one questions it. Even though the speed limits max out at 75mph. Driving a car is a privilege and no one is even considering limiting the ability or taking that away from the crazy people we all see zooming down our residential streets. If this is truly about safety, why not?
Once again driving is only a privilege not a GOD Given Right as an American owning Arms is a RIGHT! That is not to be infringed upon!
If someone wants to own a Twenty or more round magazine so they can spend more time at the range shooting targets and less time loading when they are paying for the range time by the hour, why should they not be able too. That is their right! More than your privilege to own a car that can do 100 MPH. Ask yourself why anyone would need a car that can do that? If they go that fast they are breaking the law right? I ask; do you think that is a ridiculous statement? Everyday lately I have heard politicians and Celebrities say why would anyone need a Twenty round or larger magazine? Which question is more ridiculous? In my opinion the later.
Ask yourself when 30 gang members surround your house as in what happen to an elderly lady in Compton California. Then start throwing bottles at your house and tell you can’t live there because your black; please see Attack on family in Compton latest incident in wave of anti-black violence
Jan 25, 2013
Read more at http://www.arcamax.com/currentnews/newsheadlines/s-1269465#HK1kffbjg2lso2cx.99
You deserve to have the right to have a large capacity magazine to protect your home and family.
If you want to go to the range and spend your time shooting rather than loading you deserve to have the right to a large capacity magazine.
Some of you would rather take away a RIGHT of the American people under the guise of safety than address the real problems in this Country.
Our Right to own and bear Arms has kept us safe from tyranny, helps us protect ourselves from home invasions and gangs of roaming thugs.
How as an American can you even suggest taking away one of our Bill of Rights. How long before some politician decides none of them are needed?
The 2nd Amendment protects all the rest!
Let’s focus on why people want to kill and hurt each other and not the ways they do it. Lets help those who need mental help.
In closeing If you take away all guns from civilians like in Japan. it has been demonstrated people that are intent on killing only find different methods and the good people are left to the mercy of these criminals without the means to protect themselfs, just ask the good people of Mexico, their Government does not allow them to own Arms and their people are being terrorized by criminals every day.
God Bless our founding fathers for our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Let us all protect them for freedoms sake!
Last edited:
