"To sum up, there is no dispute that the Constitution, case law and applicable statutes all establish that the District is not a State within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Under United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. at 178, the Second Amendment's declaration and guarantee that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" relates to the Militia of the States only. That the Second Amendment does not apply to the District, then, is, to me, an unavoidable conclusion."
Did anybody notice how Henderson explained Heller?
and if they don't enjoin immediately?
Alan Gura informs the DC District (Palmer) of Peruta....
http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887.49.0.pdf
and if they don't enjoin immediately?
Alan Gura will send them another sternly worded letter.
I swear Gura could file a 28(j) informing about a SCOTUS ruling mooting the case, and it still wouldn't get that district court off its ass.
Maybe his wife is running a Weekend at Bernie's scam to collect his paychecks a while longer.I swear Gura could file a 28(j) informing about a SCOTUS ruling mooting the case, and it still wouldn't get that district court off its ass.
Look at how many "Supplementals" have been filed over the years on the Docket...
http://ia700408.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887.docket.html
check the link please. It takes me to Google search.
They know they'll have to strike down the law. No other explanation.
Can they really just hold this forever?