Washington Post: Gun Owners' Next Victory in D.C.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Peaceful John

    Active Member
    May 31, 2011
    239
    "To sum up, there is no dispute that the Constitution, case law and applicable statutes all establish that the District is not a State within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Under United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. at 178, the Second Amendment's declaration and guarantee that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" relates to the Militia of the States only. That the Second Amendment does not apply to the District, then, is, to me, an unavoidable conclusion."

    Did anybody notice how Henderson explained Heller?
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,927
    WV
    "To sum up, there is no dispute that the Constitution, case law and applicable statutes all establish that the District is not a State within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Under United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. at 178, the Second Amendment's declaration and guarantee that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" relates to the Militia of the States only. That the Second Amendment does not apply to the District, then, is, to me, an unavoidable conclusion."

    Did anybody notice how Henderson explained Heller?

    That sums up just how anti she is, and why we keep having problems at the DC Circuit
     

    krucam

    Ultimate Member
    and if they don't enjoin immediately? :innocent0

    Alan Gura will send them another sternly worded letter. :innocent0

    I swear Gura could file a 28(j) informing about a SCOTUS ruling mooting the case, and it still wouldn't get that district court off its ass.

    Look at how many "Supplementals" have been filed over the years on the Docket...

    http://ia700408.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887.docket.html
     

    ryan_j

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 6, 2013
    2,264
    They know they'll have to strike down the law. No other explanation.

    Can they really just hold this forever?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,931
    Messages
    7,301,381
    Members
    33,539
    Latest member
    Nestor875

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom