http://www.wbal.com/article/98371/2...k-For-Patience-In-Gun-Application-Bottleneck-
COPYWRITE PROTECTED TEXT REMOVED- joppaj
COPYWRITE PROTECTED TEXT REMOVED- joppaj
Hence, the appeal for patience because, strictly speaking, investigators apparently do not have the authority to force dealers to hold up a sale beyond the 7 day minimum.
"Officers and staff who must process the applications need to tap into fully 17 different databases to check backgrounds. "
I didn't like the way they threw this in there. It makes it sound like some dealers might release firearms without a complete background check when we all know it doesn't happen.
Doesn't this bode well in our argument with SB 281? After all part of their arguments is based on the background checks aren't stringent enough (or aren't being done) and how easy it is to buy a firearm. Here you have the State claiming it goes through 17 different data bases for someone to go through a background check and a 7 day process is taking 5-6 weeks (we all know it's longer). So what do they propose to do logistically if they want licensing, training and registration when they are taking 6-8 times as long with their regular process because of increased volume?
and, why are these officers administrating paperwork 24/7 for law abiding citizens when they should be catching the real criminals (unless you're telling me there are real criminals and gangsters among those tens of thousands of applications ).
Doesn't this bode well in our argument with SB 281? After all part of their arguments is based on the background checks aren't stringent enough (or aren't being done) and how easy it is to buy a firearm. Here you have the State claiming it goes through 17 different data bases for someone to go through a background check and a 7 day process is taking 5-6 weeks (we all know it's longer). So what do they propose to do logistically if they want licensing, training and registration when they are taking 6-8 times as long with their regular process because of increased volume?
I didn't like the way they threw this in there. It makes it sound like some dealers might release firearms without a complete background check when we all know it doesn't happen.
That article seems to settle the question of whether dealers can release on time if MSP drags their feet on the background check.
Answer: They can.
Unfortunately that does complicate who to sue for delaying so long because the government isn't forcing dealers to wait (hard to sue them for something they aren't doing) and a lawsuit forcing a business to engage in a transaction against their will wouldn't be a good precedent and probably isn't winnable.
It strengthens the argument against giving the MSP more to do, but seems to make it harder to remedy the immediate problem of arbitrary and capricious delays.
It happens.
When?
There was a thread on here a week or so ago about it. It was a well respected and knowledgeable FFL in the area. As far as how I know it's true I'll plead the 5th before they take that one away too.