knastera
Just another shooter
You made your point. I noticed the Mac and I know many Mac loyalists, so I figured it was a fair analogy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Poking around the interwebs, you can find lots of hate for the inforce as not being very durable...especially in their clamp design. There's also a dramatic reduction in holster availability moving from the tlr1 to the inforce.
Here's a pretty solid light review of the tlr1hl.
Got mine at Primary Arms , boxed just with there name , 140.00 . Best light I've ever had .
I was looking at Streamlight and Inforce. Those are more in my price range. The first difference I noticed was Streamlight is aluminum and Inforce is polymer. Being a Glock owner, I understand how durable a good polymer can be. Any insights on how these brands compare to each other?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Following up, it looks like inforce addressed some of the durability issues with the gen 3. The clamp is now fully aluminum so it doesn't crack if overtightened now.
I can't speak from any personal experience, as all my WML's are metal, but I have heard the polymer in the Inforce's isn't the best. I've heard people say that the abuse lights have been subjected to through dropping or just general everyday use has caused the bodies and mounts to crack. They have also been known to have heat dissipation issues, but that may have been resolved in the latest generation of lights. Again, I can only parrot what I've heard. What I can say, however, is that I love my X300U and TLR-1 on my Glocks, and am a HUGE fan of the Protac series for my rifles.
Glad you bumped this!
Just so happens someone compared a Inforce to a Surefire
pistol WML...What is WML?
pistol WML...What is WML?
Weapon mounted light.