The severance clause is not binding on a Federal court. We'll have to see what the prayer for relief is in MSI's upcoming suit. Maybe they'll request MD's entire permitting and sensitive places scheme be thrown out. Or maybe not. We'll know when the briefs are filed.They specifically put in severence
Question for the JDs out in MDS-Land: If a new law that violates established civil rights (i.e. something specifically included in Heller and Bruen) can be demonstrated to have been crafted in bad faith, can a court simply mandate the entire change in law as invalid without having to address every individual issue in it?
Last edited: