Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. A

      Baker v Kealoha ~ Hawaii Right to Carry

      Given the order calling for further briefing in Peruta, I don't think we will be seeing anything in Baker, just yet.
    2. A

      Peruta v. County of San Diego (CCW Case)

      Yesterday, in another order for the Peruta case, we have this: If I am figuring correctly, both sides have until March 27th to file.
    3. A

      McKay v. Hutchens (CA CCW) orals at CA9

      The case, McKay v. Hutchens, is at the 9th circuit. It is however, stayed pending resolution of not just Peruta, but also U.S. v. Chovan, Richards v. Prieto and Baker v. Kealoha. Peruta has been decided, as has Choven. Both parties in Richards have filed 28J letters in regards to both Choven...
    4. A

      Peruta v. County of San Diego (CCW Case)

      I now think the tip-off was the day before, when Orange County revised their procedures to accept self defense as good cause. This most likely will moot the case, McKay v. Hutchinson (Sheriff of O.C.), which is before the 9th and is stayed, pending the outcome of Peruta, Richards and Baker...
    5. A

      NRA CHALLENGES CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FED. HANDGUN BAN FOR LAW ABIDING 18-20 YEAR OLDS

      Thanks, Kharn. Friday will be an interesting conference... wish I was a mouse, there!
    6. A

      California Victory!

      I keep hearing all this crap about Heller and McDonald "squeaking" by with a mere 5/4 win... Fact is that all 9 Justices were in agreement that the 2A was an individual right. We get the 5/4 split in whether or not the right meant anything. Kcbrown, do a little research and inform yourself of...
    7. A

      Hodgkins/Dearth v. Holder (SAF Gura) Residency Requirement for Handguns

      We have almost quit following this case. A lot has happened since 2011. It has been up to the DCCA once before and sent back down to the District. Again, the District ruled against Dearth and is now back up to the DCCA. Here is the summary at the Internet Archive. And here is an incomplete...
    8. A

      Peruta v. County of San Diego (CCW Case)

      No conference yesterday. That will be on the 21st.
    9. A

      SAF files for cert in Drake (NJ may-issue)

      Kharn, all the briefs were readable to my machine - PC running Linux.
    10. A

      SAF Sues New York City over Handgun Fees!

      My pleasure, Mark. It's a sure bet that neither of us can be everywhere or even remember everything.
    11. A

      Peruta v. County of San Diego (CCW Case)

      pulled - got my cases mixed up
    12. A

      Kolbe v O'Malley Sheduling Order

      The docket at the Internet Archive has been updated. http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mdd.254564/gov.uscourts.mdd.254564.docket.html And I've made available the Third Amended Complaint. More, later as I'm off to work, just now. 30
    13. A

      Kolbe v O'Malley Sheduling Order

      Yes it is. Try tracking all the cases that I do, if you want to throw away money! :D I've lost track of this case, and haven't placed it on my list. sigh. I'll try and remedy that situation as soon as time allows.
    14. A

      Morris v. US Army Corps of Engineers

      This is only the start. A very good start, but the ACE can still appeal to the 9th.
    15. A

      Post-McDonald Second Amendment Cases

      All briefs for cases granted cert may be found at the ABA site. Abramski briefs are here: http://www.americanbar.org/publications/preview_home/12-1493.html
    16. A

      SAF Sues New York City over Handgun Fees!

      I checked and the docket which shows the following entry: Document #105 reads, in part:
    17. A

      Colorado Couple Challenge USPS Ban Of Firearms on Postal Property

      The case, as decided at the District Court, applied only to the defendant and only to a specific location in CO. The USPS is foolish (IMO) to push this into the Appellate Court. An adverse ruling (adverse to the USPS) may very well open up all public parking areas within the 10th Circuit...
    18. A

      Colorado Couple Challenge USPS Ban Of Firearms on Postal Property

      Thanks Mark. I've have recently gotten too much on my plate to post everywhere like I used to.
    19. A

      Federal Judge Says California ‘Waiting Period’ Gun Laws Are Likely Unconstitutional

      And the Judge didn't say that at all.
    20. A

      Silvester v. Kamala Harris CA 10 Day Wait

      The docket noted in the earlier post (back on page 1) is now incorrect. The PACER case number was changed. The correct docket may be found here: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.caed.233362/gov.uscourts.caed.233362.docket.html This is only the first challenge. The case has...
    Top Bottom