Kharn
Ultimate Member
The statute and case law don't say only an individual risk is acceptable, membership in a group with an increased risk above the general public is also acceptable. Clearance holders are an identifiable group.
There was a change recently, 9/16/2020, that prevents the disclosure of security clearance level as a G&S reason for W&C permits. Calling it a 'personal gain' and therefore not allowed.
No one has given proof how having a clearance puts them in danger.
Admin assistants in my office have TS clearances. They have no more assumed risk of danger. Flight attendants know TS info. Hell, they are in more danger than some everyday worker bee at NSA.
I've been in the admin side and operational side of having a TS. I've never seen danger and risk in the admin side.
I have real world experience.
So, just say clearance holders are using the system. Because I see beyond the smoke this "G&S" ******** they're trying to blow up people's asses.
So really your expertise here is how to beat the system. You really couldn't give a shit less on the actual reasons people need a permit.
But you'll say anyone who retorts anything contrary to your belief is anti 2A.
I'm all for shall issue. But it's hilarious to see people scramble behind ideas of how they can try to beat the Maryland system.
But yeah. Go ahead and "call me out" because I make a case.
Whatever dude.I’m not sure why you continually have a hard-on for this. The more I read your comments on the topic the more it’s clear that you literally have no real experience in this, which is good, it means that those working within the IC at TS/SCI on Mission activities have done a good job, but for some reason it strikes a nerve with you suggesting you harbor a grudge and animosity for some reason. There have been many, many, many documented events and threats over the years, you are not aware because you simply don’t have a need to know. To suggest that there is no risk is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve read on the internet since Al Gore invented it. Suggesting that someone actively working on the Mission Ops side for 20-30 years on both sides of the river then transitioning rolls within the Community has no need or less of a need than someone racking up frequent flyer miles is absurd. And for the OP, for at least 40 years, when someone is indoc’ed they swear and attest that they will not use their tickets for personal gain or benefit under penalty of Law, nothing new to see there.....,
Whatever dude.
So, why should it be on the state of Maryland to make sure someone is armed because of the "danger" of having a clearance?
I'll wait....
We definitely don't need to go that far. Hogan will probably remove the G&S requirement any decade now.