Bianchi v. Frosh had its first conference Friday and was not on the orders list this morning. For now it lives.
This is good news.
Hey guys...
Can you translate for the legally verbose challengedSeems we will likely see GVRs, and not per curiams in the next orders list.
The original 4th circuit 3 Judge decision in Kolbe was a slam dunk for us. It was the en banc appeal that took that away.A GVR seems like it might be a bit disappointing. Bruen chiefly addressed the may issue requirement, but the opinion went further in addressing other issues. How far will a circuit (the 4th in particular) be willing to take the issue on their own in light of Bruen?
My guess is not as far as we'd like. Then we find ourselves waiting for another circuit conflict.
Can you translate for the legally verbose challenged
The original 4th circuit 3 Judge decision in Kolbe was a slam dunk for us. It was the en banc appeal that took that away.
A GVR is when a cert petition is "Granted, Vacated, and remanded" back down to the lower court.Can you translate for the legally verbose challenged
But AWB stays in place until District Court issues injunction and/or new decision?GVR in Bianchi v. Frosh formally kills Kolbe v. Hogan.
But AWB stays in place until District Court issues injunction and/or new decision?