.350 is a straight wall cartridge nothing like a .223.Is 350 simular to 223 but workimg around that bottle neck law?
.350 is a straight wall cartridge nothing like a .223.Is 350 simular to 223 but workimg around that bottle neck law?
It does not meet the 1200 ft/lb energy requirement for rifles --see the discussion in the Airgun section---I had long conversation with DNR guy about this very subject. Of course it is powerful enough- as would be a .357 or .45 levergun--it is just not legal ---would be legal from a pistol probably at 700 ft/lb---dumb regulation in my opinion--it may change in a year or 2 (or 3). I have Ruger Pc Carbine in .40s&w that I would like to use too. Like I said -read the section of the Hunting Guide that applies
Have to push a 200 grain at 1250 fps for a pistol, and 1650 fps for the rifle. I can push a 170 that fast in a handgun in a 41 mag, but a 10 is < 41 mag.
So you want them to confiscate your firearm to take it to a lab and conduct an energy test? You can google FPE and see that it doesn't meet the specs. I'm pretty sure DNR police have smartphones. Do what you want but I'd go with something I know won't be questioned.Like I've said countless times before the burden of proof is on the state not on me. They have to prove that it doesn't reach that kind of energy I don't have to prove sh"t.
That said I'll probably make another choice even if I think the regulation is ridiculous. I guess I'll stick to handgun hunting with my 10 mm
Ah I see that and it's interesting to see it was made around this law.
Except the case head..350 is a straight wall cartridge nothing like a .223.
And that's where I got the similarityExcept the case head.
Except the case head
So a 300blk is like a .223 because it's a necked up 556 case? They also use the same primers.Except the case head.
Muzzle energies of 700+ f/lbs can be achieved with the 10mm pistol round.So you want them to confiscate your firearm to take it to a lab and conduct an energy test? You can google FPE and see that it doesn't meet the specs. I'm pretty sure DNR police have smartphones. Do what you want but I'd go with something I know won't be questioned.
Maryland and is residents . Both f’ed upSo you want them to confiscate your firearm to take it to a lab and conduct an energy test? You can google FPE and see that it doesn't meet the specs. I'm pretty sure DNR police have smartphones. Do what you want but I'd go with something I know won't be questioned.
Huh?Maryland and is residents . Both f’ed up
No the burden of proof is going to be on you.Okay then I go with my clock 20 with a 6-inch barrel. 220 grain Buffalo bore heavy makes 703 foot pounds of energy. Or I can use my Henry 357 that makes 1900 feet per second with 158 grain bullet.
Frankly I'm not too concerned about that regulation since the burden of proof is on the state. You're right it's a ridiculous regulation considering virtually most other types of weapons used to harvest whitetail deer in the state of Maryland are incapable of making that kind of energy but are still perfectly legal to hunt with.
Awww you poor thing. Let us know how it works for you.Unfortunately this year I’m using a borrowed ruger Deerfield 44 mag.
Long story short, The unfortunate part is all my guns are locked up in a bitter divorce process.Awww you poor thing. Let us know how it works for you.
Sorry for your trouble. I was being facetious, as I would love to have a Deerfield to use.Long story short, The unfortunate part is all my guns are locked up in a bitter divorce process.
Heck I am pushing 1800FPS with a 350-grain shell form a .500 S&W loaded with some H-110.Have to push a 200 grain at 1250 fps for a pistol, and 1650 fps for the rifle. I can push a 170 that fast in a handgun in a 41 mag, but a 10 is < 41 mag.