1. Wtf are you talking about? Rifle scopes? Turning mine in? I have no clue what you are talking about, but that makes two of us.
I'm not turning in $hit and I said nothing about anyone turning in anything.
2. I'm offering an opinion that I don't think five justices will find a 2A violation of...
I hate to be "that guy" but I don't have much confidence that a 2A attack on a bump stock ban will be successful.
If you read Heller, the door is left open to ban certain (as of yet unnamed) firearms, and bump stocks aren't even firearms. They are non-essential accessories (as opposed to say...
Persuading people to give up deeply held beliefs is extraordinarily difficult. You might win some converts among those who are basically undecided but won't have much luck with people who have already made up their minds, no matter your arguments or the evidence.
This is not a left/right...
Yep. I've got rifles (BM59 and an Argentine FN49) for which they only made 20-round mags. So they'd become boat anchors under this scenario.
Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk
Guys, there is no requirement that newly outlawed items be grandfathered in, and a failure to do so does NOT violate the Ex Post Facto (XPF) clause of the US Constitution.
The XPF clause simply means that the G can't prosecute you for having OWNED (past tense) something that is now illegal...
Serious question and not some sort of challenge: Who here actually believes that the Reagan MG ban will be lifted in the next four years?
I, for one, do NOT think it will. I wish it would and I'd gladly give up the value of my FA in order to buy lots of other goodies, but I just don't see it...
Have an Argentine Navy (Argentine Marine Corps, actually).
Detachable 20-round box mag in 7.62 NATO.
Love it!
The only 7.62 I like more is my Beretta BM59.
Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk