- Aug 17, 2011
- 26,177
I just threw up in my mouth!
that is a crime against all that is good and pure.
It'll be ok, this abomination upon the lord JMB will not stand.
I almost threw up, but pure rage and disgust helped choke that back.
I just threw up in my mouth!
that is a crime against all that is good and pure.
It'll be ok, this abomination upon the lord JMB will not stand.
well spoken my friend!
I almost threw up, but pure rage and disgust helped choke that back.
I had to fight the urge to shoot the screen with my a-5
Why two triggers. Makes no sense.
And When did Bevis and Butthead start making guns ? ?
If nothing else, it highlights the availability of left handed 1911's now...
Why two triggers. Makes no sense.
And When did Bevis and Butthead start making guns ? ?
1 trigger firing two bullets equals a machine gun to the ATF. 2 triggers firing 2 bullets is just fine.
Funny thing is that I'm not sure their current system works like that (i.e., "2 triggers firing 2 bullets") . At first I thought that there was a mechanism that kept the action locked until the second shot, then both actions were cycled at the same time. Then I saw that there was a shared hammer so, I assume, the gun only fires when both triggers are pulled at the same time. Thus, when you press the first trigger nothing happens... then press the second trigger and the unified hammer is released firing both rounds.
I think that is far more akin to a trigger and set trigger rather than two triggers firing two bullets (like other double barrel firearms). If that ATF sees it this way, it would likely consider this a regulated NFA item IMO... Heck, if shoelaces and choreboy pads are regulated, this thing is doomed.
I noticed that too, but that's the only way I can make sense of it LOL.
I just threw up in my mouth!
that is a crime against all that is good and pure.