jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
4 if you count Caetano, which states the 2A extends outside the home. For some reason, everyone is ignoring it because it was a taser.
Caetano was not about extending the 2A outside the home. All it really did was to say that the State Court's reasoning conflicts with existing precedent. Applicability of the 2A outside the home was not mentioned at all. The reasoning in Caetano centered around the fact that the 2A applied to modern arms and was not restricted to those around during the founding era. There also did not need to be a "readily adaptable to use in the military"
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caetano_v._Massachusetts for a more detailed summary