Braces were "created" as the result of a non-binding interpretation. They are being banned as part of a formal rule-making process. I read what you wrote; the problem is that it's a screed, not a legal analysis. Nothing's illegal until SCOTUS rules on it, and right now, the NFA's running at 1 W, 0 L in SCOTUS and they haven't said a thing about braces as of yet, or the ATF's ability to define what is or is not a stock or a rifle.Did you actually read what I wrote?? The SBR laws were created under the National Firearms Act of 1934. It's a Federal law created by an act of Congress. So, I abide by the law. This brace rule is illegal and holds no weight per the Supreme Court. As a citizen, I'm not required to follow the rule. I cannot be touched. If I am, I am due redress from the government. You seem to be forgetting that WE THE PEOPLE are in charge, NOT the government, whose purpose it to SERVE US. They will serve me, not the other way around. I'm continually amazed by how many people in this state have battered gun owner syndrome.
This thing where people think Bruen is now a get-out-of-jail-free card for every gun law they don't like is hilarious, and I suspect there's going to be a lot of surprised, angry people when SCOTUS declines to hear the challenge to the brace ban.