That isn't true on your last. Several states have zero tolerance laws. Any level of THC shows up in your blood work from a DUI blood draw, you are going to jail. Full stop. Sure, the issue there is you could have used a week ago and not remotely intoxicated.I’m very sure there are legalization advocacy groups shilling for a particular position that you could post. Feel free. I’m comfortable letting folks here compare the data and analysis from my reference to whatever you might post in reply. The fact of the matter is that if those tests were accurate, states across the nation would be universally stampeding to adopt them. But that isn’t happening, despite the fact that *everyone* wants this. There is a reason for that…
Someday I hope you will be right. But until then there are two indisputable facts: 1) today NO legal nationwide roadside test exists for THC, and 2) if or until that happens DUI stoners are out on the road, imperiling innocent people’s lives, without facing the same legal consequences for their actions as drunk drivers. This isn’t a hypothetical keyboard-discussion in my family…
- 10 states have zero tolerance for THC or a metabolite.
- 3 states have zero tolerance for THC but no restriction on metabolites.
- 4 states have specific per se limits for THC
- 1 state (Colorado) has a permissible inference law for THC