Perhaps no help to this law but how much time is left for them to rework the gerrymandered map.
Wrong... ******** meme...
It SHOULD read... "When you've made you choice to NOT be one who comes to take them."
But don't let the hate for the PoPo go... 'kay?
EVERYone knows they ALL want you disarmed... Right?
God Bless the Oath Keepers and those that value their pledges and the Constitution.
Wrong... ******** meme...
It SHOULD read... "When you've made you choice to NOT be one who comes to take them."
But don't let the hate for the PoPo go... 'kay?
EVERYone knows they ALL want you disarmed... Right?
God Bless the Oath Keepers and those that value their pledges and the Constitution.
Chillax. This wasn’t a personal attack on you. We all know where you stand on this ********. You will not obey an order to directly violate the Constitution.
Chillax. This wasn’t a personal attack on you. We all know where you stand on this ********. You will not obey an order to directly violate the Constitution.
Not in that camp... I think the 1302 law is a evil aberration... My intent in all of this is that until it is ruled as unconstitutional by a superior court... we are stuck with it as is. "Claiming" that it is unconstitutional WITHOUT the backing of the superior court ruling... and acting to ignore it... or refusing to do as the law requires... will get LEOs FIRED and charged with dereliction of duty.
Are you sure we all know where he stands?
However, I will agree with RD that without public support, it is unrealistic to ask police to throw their careers away by disobeying an order. Right now our community is ineffective at pushing back against gun grabbers. We don't have the political might to vote out politicians, and we don't have the organization to support or influence police. Without at least one of those abilities, we are left to count the number of ERPOs and hope we don't become one of them.
He is right in that I never intend to violate what I know is a COTUS right for any American Citizen.
But... I also want the Courts to weigh in with THEIR support to tell these power hungry pukes that their law is in need of major adjustment to make it protect the COTUS rights of the individual who has been accused without the normal presumption of innocence ... AND the protection of their rights of property and privacy.
THAT is the only way this can be settled to the benefit of all concerned.
They were there to serve a protective order as well as one of the state's new extreme-risk protective orders. Willis, 61, would have to temporarily give any guns he had.
After a confrontation, Willis fired a gun, according to police. Then one of the officers shot Willis, killing him.
The Anne Arundel County police chief pointed to the incident as an example that Maryland's new "red flag" law was working, saying that the situation could have been worse if police had not intervened, according to the Capital Gazette.
So if given the duty to act on a ERPO you'd do so? I'm just not familiar with cops that sideline as Constitutional Law attorneys or experts with expectations of belaying lawful orders as were legislated or orders from a judge. What's your take on the challenges to ERPO's on Constitutional grounds that have been dismissed?
Cops enforce laws as written by legislature. They enjoy doing so, or they'd find another job. I take it a cop has personal discretion with a contact he/she initiates on what to charge someone with. Something like an ERPO comes from a Judge, then somewhere up the LEO ladder someone directs whoever to take care of business. A cop that say's he's not going to comply with an order, I doubt will be employed much longer. Same deal with magazine arrests in states that prohibit certain types. Cops love collaring people when they have contraband. They get excited about it.
As to the prior meem, those two stickers together are absolutely convoluted. "Come and take them" implies to most people I speak with as a situation of non compliance with the state is going to occur if they demand your arms. In the same breath, you see sticker I guess is one of support for law enforcement. So is that person going to resist or not? I have honestly never reviewed any situation where resisting cops has ever had a better outcome than complying. I don't know all the details of the person killed at the recent ERPO in Maryland, but it shows very clearly that any level of non compliance with an officer can cost your life.
Too many incorrect assumptions to answer from the cell phone.
But for starters...
“...enjoy enforcing laws as written by the legislature.”
you clearly do not know what you’re talking about.
And...
“...but it shows very clearly that any level of non compliance with an officer can cost your life.”
Wrong... getting into a physical wrestling match with a LEO over a handgun and popping off a round in the process... can cost you your life. But... “any level of non compliance”??? Not hardly.