Well, the lower courts have let NY get away with it so far, with nothing but a suspended TRO. This is exactly what many of us supposed BGOS victims were afraid of post-Bruen, that lower courts would continue to defer to state legislatures because none of them wants to feel responsible for "putting more guns on the streets", enumerated right or not. Nothing will change in NY or NJ until one of these cases gets back to SCOTUS in 5 years, and SCOTUS actually issues a direct order to the lower court to issue a specific ruling. There needs to be a cultural change in some courts 2A jurisprudence that may require generational change on the bench to effect.Just came across this article.
Looks like New Jersey is trying to pass NY style gun control on steroids. Sensitive places, private property without owners consent, blah, blah, blah.
Man I hate these azzholes.
Always!It always works when you legislate and regulate yourself into safety and prosperity.
Scotus just need to rule permitting schemes unconstitutional and which make the whole country constitutional carry.
Hopefully the NFA dies soon too and all the GCA's none of them can stand with THT
Good Point. They can also name the places to be marked sensitive. Really they need to just remove 2A from any state control at all.Agreed but the lack of permitting doesn’t have anything to do with these jerkwads making everything a sensitive place. I sincerely hope that SCOTUS hears this soon and gives it the grand smack down it deserves.
So very tired as a lawful gun owner of being treated worse than an actual criminal. It’s shameful.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or Dundalk. It's closer....... so I drove her to New Jersey
NY amd NJ can easily stretch out the process. Sort of a passive-aggressive, albeit temporary, win.I think these cases will be at SCOTUS in less than 5 years.