Very likely their strategy. If you read some of their releases, they view Bruen as an aberration, not a change in overall trajectory towards ending private weapon possession of any kind. Whereas we view Bruen as a sea change in the relationship amongst 2A, the Government, and the People.Some of these state's legislators...and/or the gun control groups behind them...could be hoping that by the time the challenges get through the courts and ultimately the Supreme Court that the Court's makeup will have changed by then more to their liking.
Foot dragging by lower courts is a tool the Antis will leverage in order to delay and deflect the real-world effects of Bruen until a solution for the decision itself can be found.
Last edited: