Wouldn't it be nice if the MGA were reviewing for clarity the laws they enact instead of being bent on passing yet more ambiguous ones, he asks rhetorically.
Wouldn't it be nice if the MGA were reviewing for clarity the laws they enact instead of being bent on passing yet more ambiguous ones, he asks rhetorically.
The personal choice is deciding if you think you will be prosecuted.
A court will decide on the meaning of “on the way to or returning from”
Until a court decides, there are no interpretations.
There are understandings, but they are not interpretations in a legal sense but
IANAL
An arrest and conviction would certainly get the attention of the 2A community with so many groups watching for significant court decisions. It would not go unnoticed
ambiguity cuts two ways. Nobody wants to their fate determined by 12 random people. AG does not want a court ruling setting precedence, so they make a deal. But getting the AG do drop the charges still costs time, money, your prints are in the system, you might spend a night or three in jail before you make bail, and the record will need to be expunged. Life will still not be the same.
Perhaps a ruling would give guidance to not only SA throughout the state but to those of us who must decide the level of risk we want to assume
For a while now, I've been reading more than posting... and for a while now I have been pointing less people to this forum. For those that I have pointed here, I have warned them of the infighting contained within. Sad... sorry Laj... I told you so...
P.S. Laj and I are good friends...
There has never been one case presented on this board or in the news that I’ve ever heard of.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe instructors teaching HQL training need to add counter-surveillance to their curriculum?