NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

[TLL]

I don't want a Md-nonresident ccw. I want reciprocity to my VA permit.

Sent from my moto g(7) plus using Tapatalk

 

[Norton]

I thought you were kidding. A scorned woman....

The ruling directly addresses that advances in firearms technology is not relative. It fvcking says it right there, but of course she knows that.

 

[Inigoes]

The contention that KIB is making is that the stipulation for granting said carry permit has been deemed unconstitutional, and therefore everything related to it is unconstitutional as well. You can't have a statute that mandates the usage of a permit when the permit process as it currently stands is unconstitutional. It renders the whole thing null and void.

There is a severability doctrine in the legal world, that allows only the unconstitutional portion to be stricken while the rest of the law stands.

 

[camo556]

There is a severability doctrine in the legal world, that allows only the unconstitutional portion to be stricken while the rest of the law stands.

this.

And, the MSI lawsuit presently before the court only challenged two subparts (I forgot the exact #) related to good and substantial. Even if MSI wins, we still have the training, interviews, references, etc.

 

[Mike]

This goes to my point exactly. They don't care. Hell, this may actually result in more gun control legislation for consideration than there otherwise would have been. They are openly hostile to the SCOTUS - many of them see current SCOTUS as illegitimate because Orange Man Bad and Orange Man Bad's picks allowed this to happen.

And I ask the question again - if these remaining May Issue states don't change a damn thing or do the absolute minimum while increasing costs/training, shortening license times, etc... what will happen to them? Who "forces" them to comply?

The same thing should happen as happened when racial segregation laws were declared unconstitutional and some states refused to comply. But the current treasonous cabal in DC will not do that.

 

[budman93]

this.

And, the MSI lawsuit presently before the court only challenged two subparts (I forgot the exact #) related to good and substantial. Even if MSI wins, we still have the training, interviews, references, etc.

Interviews are subjective just the same as good and substantial. I dont think you can keep those after they clearly said requirements must be objective.

 

[teratos]

The ruling directly addresses that advances in firearms technology is not relative. It fvcking says it right there, but of course she knows that.

She counts on her base to be spoonfed. So they’ll believe her and cheer on her irrelevant musket stupidity.

I know you knew that.

 

[Michigander08]

The ruling directly addresses that advances in firearms technology is not relative. It fvcking says it right there, but of course she knows that.

We prepare to strip her citizenship and she can go back to wherever her ancestors came from!

 

[cms1528]

So can this idiot be charged with a criminal offense, or civil only, if he was to carry out his threat?

"Nothing Changes Today" - Lawless NYC Mayor Eric Adams Promises to Ignore Supreme Court Ruling on Concealed Gun Laws | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Supreme Court released its ruling on Thursday against New York’s law that includes strict rules for concealed carry in the state. Prior to this ruling, the state could decide who it wanted to have this right and who it didn’t. The Gateway Pundit reported on this case moments ago: New York...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The lawsuits alone will bankrupt that city if he fails to follow the law.

 

[Presumptuous]

I thought you were kidding. A scorned woman....

Oh I am absolutely down to carry a 50 cal black powder rifle with me everywhere

 

[jcutonilli]

I think people are misunderstanding what was just decided. The decided that "New York's proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment" The rest of the may issue licensing system remains. The case gets remanded to the lower courts to figure out how to deal with the opinion.

While the Court came to the correct decision, it did so by some inconsistent reasoning that is still subject to interpretation. We will need to wait and see how those opposed will interpret the decision to their advantage.

As for MD, the decision technically does not cover MD's G&S requirement. As currently interpreted, the G&S requirement would not survive a challenge, but it is sufficiently vague that other requirements may be imposed in their place. We will need to wait and see if there are other requirements that take its place.

 

[babalou]

and like that Mr. Saltpeter chimes in. yay!

 

[Apd09]

and like that Mr. Saltpeter chimes in. yay!

Joey Ryan has something for Mr. Saltpeter.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Muleskinner]

The ruling directly addresses that advances in firearms technology is not relative. It fvcking says it right there, but of course she knows that.

She's already requested a special legislative session...They are going to "craft" an end run around this ruling..

 

[Magnumst]

the Courts of Appeals have developed a “two-step” framework for analyzing Second Amendment challenges that combines history with means-end scrutiny. The Court rejects that two-part approach as having one step too many.

As I read this, it seems to me that an application is step one and any other requirement beyond this is step 2 and out of bounds.

 

[TheOriginalMexicanBob]

Take away her camera and such.. speech back then was via town criers and papers

If we have to go back to muskets then the NY Times, Washington Post et al should have to go back to hand laid typeset and manual printing presses that were state of the art at the time.

 

[teratos]

She's already requested a special legislative session...They are going to "craft" an end run around this ruling..

This should be fun to watch. One step test and all…

 

[Muleskinner]

This should be fun to watch. One step test and all…

I never put it past the leftists to refuse to comply with a SCOTUS ruling. Is there even a penalty for refusing? What can really be done?

 

[TheOriginalMexicanBob]

If they don't comply the proper recourse is to file suit to force them to. That can be a long and expensive process even if you win.

 

[jbrown50]

I don't want a Md-nonresident ccw. I want reciprocity to my VA permit.

Sent from my moto g(7) plus using Tapatalk

Same here with my permits but the statists have a bad habit of raising their ugly heads. I have no doubt Thomas wanted to go further including declaring all licensing unconstitutional but was limited by the scope and, like Scalia with Kennedy, had to water it down to keep the majority on board. At least we can enjoy the demise of G&S/may issue.