SB387 "Public Safety - Untraceable Firearms" - The Ban on Private Firearm Making

[adit]

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

REPLY
dblas quoted:
Yep, on it's face, but that law still needs to be challenged in Maryland and found the same using the same logic as the Judge in WV did. Would a Federal District Judge in Maryland find the same way? I sure hope so. The guidance is pretty clear to you and me, but there are those that believe SCOTUS got it wrong and may decide to skirt the edge of the Bruen ruling. The outcome of that is that it goes to the 4th Circuit and they decide, which it would anyway given that absolutely no one will settle for a Federal District ruling against them for either side.

Now the question, how do we mount a challenge without having someone violate the law?

Have someone from another state seek guidance with MSP/SA on bringing an unserialized firearm into the state. When they reply with the expected "no", someone would have standing.

 

[sygata]

Are engravings on PMF's tax deductible?

 

[pcfixer]

Are engravings on PMF's tax deductible?

NO "ROFLOL"