rob b
c@r collecting
when does the MGA end its reign of terror
The wording used during the hearing was not conclusive, but in no way is this "self registration through an online portal".
What they described was:
1) Pay an FFL to serialize a receiver with a unique serial number
2) Fill out a 77R with that new serial number
3) (Implied) Pay 77R fee
4) (Implied) Wait 8 days - because all 77Rs have a wait
5) (Implied) Pick it up
They used "77R" in the committee hearing. And they wanted to do this because FFLs wouldn't comply with the previous proposed rule, so they want to take liability away from the FFL. With the liability removed, this becomes a police run registration of "ghost guns", which is what they want: the ability to take a gun recovered at a crime and ask someone "where did this go". Now, what kind of idiot is going to use a serialized firearm that can be traced back to them? Lol.
when does the MGA end its reign of terror
.It doesn’t.
I just wanted to personally thank everyone who called, wrote, testified, and fought this piece of trash legislation. We'll all hang together, or we'll all hang separately. God bless all of our patriots.
I didn't put my skin on the line testifying, emailing, and calling, to the point of borderline *harassing* Senator Lee's office, for us to give up here. They know everything about me down to my blood type!!! I AM NOT GIVING UP THIS FIGHT.
I will do anything with this community to get his attention for a veto, I don't care if that means paying for advertising that says "call this number".
No more defeatism until it gets to his desk. Spread the word to every inch of this forum over the next few weeks, our best, and only remaining plan, is to get a veto from Hogan.
Lopezes office emailed me back its the same list that nickberg500 got from lees office that he already went through. I bet the question was do you engrave firearms with out asking about engraving serial numbers. So this 1/3 with dealers engraving numbers is a “big lie” a term the like to use.
The wording used during the hearing was not conclusive, but in no way is this "self registration through an online portal".
What they described was:
1) Pay an FFL to serialize a receiver with a unique serial number
2) Fill out a 77R with that new serial number
3) (Implied) Pay 77R fee
4) (Implied) Wait 8 days - because all 77Rs have a wait
5) (Implied) Pick it up
They used "77R" in the committee hearing. And they wanted to do this because FFLs wouldn't comply with the previous proposed rule, so they want to take liability away from the FFL. With the liability removed, this becomes a police run registration of "ghost guns", which is what they want: the ability to take a gun recovered at a crime and ask someone "where did this go". Now, what kind of idiot is going to use a serialized firearm that can be traced back to them? Lol.
Would this require someone have an HQL to get their gun back?
Would this require someone have an HQL to get their gun back?
Caveat: the bill in its amended form is not yet available for analysis.
It might seem like useless info at this point with the Senate bill Amendment, but anything can change at a moment's notice. For all we know Lopez doubles down and insists the FFL requirement stays.Email sent i ask what was the question that was asked.
I don't have an HQL. I'm not getting a HQL. This violates the taking clause in the MD Constitution.
Of course, I got fvcked with the bump-stock crap, too.
When will it be available?