In what way?
I ordered 1200 rounds, and they route to a 3rd party site to process the credit card.
Seemed to go through fine.
Has anyone else considered that this is being done because the Federal government lost a patent lawsuit and the original patent holder was awarded 15 million in damages?
They had a big data breech a few months back and many credit card numbers were stolen
Folks,
ATF's attempt to classify this ammo as AP is bunk and if they persist they will end up in a costly and embarrassing lawsuit because the ammo fails to meet the Fed/legal definition of "AP" defined in US Code.
This is much ado about nada and is nothing more than ATF attempting to break the law and badger folks
If Congress were smart about it they would have hearing about the ATF breaking the law and badger the snot out of the administration and ATF
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921
(17)
(A) The term “ammunition” means ammunition or cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellent powder designed for use in any firearm.
(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means—
(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or
(ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.
Its comprised mostly of lead so it fails the first and it was not designed and intended for use in a handgun.....and I'm pretty sure the jacket doesnt have a weight of 25% of the projectile
Precisely! M855 has a copper jacket, and its core is NOT entirely one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium. It's core is predominantly lead, with a small piece of steel at the tip. For ATF to declare M855 to be "armor piercing" under law, it would need to have a core comprised ENTIRELY of one or more of the listed substances.
The russian 5.45x39 ban we've heard about fails to meet the definition of AP either but the admin can attempt to ban its import as non sporting
Has anyone else considered that this is being done because the Federal government lost a patent lawsuit and the original patent holder was awarded 15 million in damages?
They had a big data breech a few months back and many credit card numbers were stolen
So?
I have had maybe 4 cards hacked over the last year or so. Only downside is that it takes a few days to get a new card.
My card gets hacked or stolen, some whacky charges show up, the credit card company contacts me, I tell them NO, I did not place those charges, and they close the account and send me a new card.
It is not kicking ass. They are not counting your votes on that petition. If you don't believe me sign it with a different name and email and see if your vote gets counted. It won't! For every 1000 users they are maybe counting 1 or 2 votes. You are better slamming them with emails, letters, faxes & phone calls! This is not the time to sit on the sidelines everyone should get involved in this fight!
I'm seeing that .22 and .22mag over 40 grain will be banned too. Didn't catch that before
Where are you seeing that?
Only M855/SS109 bullets are on the block.
NOT rimfire.
Not that many .22LR are greater than 40 gr mainly 40 and DOWN.
Category I: .22 Caliber Projectiles
A .22 caliber projectile that otherwise would be classified as armor piercing ammunition under 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(B) will be considered to be “primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes” under section 921(a)(17)(C) if the projectile weighs 40 grains or less AND is loaded into a rimfire cartridge.