glock9mm
Ultimate Member
I have a PSA and it's been a great gun for about $750.00.
I highly recommend it for an entry level AR.
I highly recommend it for an entry level AR.
I have a PSA and it's been a great gun for about $750.00.
I highly recommend it for an entry level AR.
What do you guys think about the M&P 15-22? ....
It's a fine rifle if what you're looking for is a range toy - especially an indoor range toy. It's light, shoots really cheap ammo and had a low recoil. What is not to love?
I'll be a dissenting voice, the 15-22 doesn't do anything better than a Ruger 10/22 except look tactical. A real mil spec AR is much more.
15-22 comes with better sights, a free floated barrel, and higher capacity magazines. It can mount tactical toys and is optic ready right out of the box.
And yes it has a MUCH higher CDI factor.
All of which adds up to" MORE FUN" - and who doesn't want "MORE FUN" (tm)?
Nobody expects it to be the same., but that .22 will never be the same as a true 5.56 AR15.
Because the .22 clone is cheaper, and they get to play with something that feels/operates just like the more expensive "full caliber" option. They are fun (who doesn't like a .22LR?) and extreamly cheap to shoot. Not only that but they can be shot at ANY indoor range (and I have been to ranges where you are limited to .22LR).I just don't get the .22 replica thing that's going on now and why people would fork over so much cash for just another .22 that at best will only live up to the standards set by models like the 10/22, the Marlin 60 for double the money.
That is correct, but if all you're doing is punching paper at an indoor range do you need to spend all that extra dough on ammo.Just remember, the 15-22 is not a tactical rifle, it only looks like one.
Nobody expects it to be the same.
It is not a defensive arm, and it's hunting is limited to squirrels and rabbits. But for someone who just wants to shoot on an indoor range it's perfect.
Because the .22 clone is cheaper, and they get to play with something that feels/operates just like the more expensive "full caliber" option. They are fun (who doesn't like a .22LR?) and extreamly cheap to shoot. Not only that but they can be shot at ANY indoor range (and I have been to ranges where you are limited to .22LR).
I just wish my M261 was as accurate as these .22 variants.
That is correct, but if all you're doing is punching paper at an indoor range do you need to spend all that extra dough on ammo.
Palmetto State Armory had a 16" M4 rifle with an Magpul mbus flip up sight and Aimpoint PRO optic for $999, I don't currently see that on their website but with the holidays coming up I would think those guys would do something similar again.
10/22 in one of the tactical style stocks would be just as or more accurate than a 15-22. Even more so if the barrel were upgraded which this is one of the few guns that anyone can do so themselves with limited tools.
Granted, start spending more money and you can do even better. But we're talking out of the box - a base 10/22 and that stock will set you back as much as the MP 10-22 but not have the sights or the right feel.
Sure it looks similar to an AR, but the magazine release is not the same, nor is loading the magazine the same.
Another advantage of the MP-22 is you use the same manual of arms for the -22 as you would for the full power AR, making it a great training tool.
A .22 won't suit your needs as you described them. .22's are good rifles for certain purposes like hunting small game like squirrel, rabbit, etc. They're also great for plinking at the range. They're a lot of fun to shoot and you can get about 47,000 rounds of ammo for around $1.35.
In the right hands a .22 can also be quite lethal to a human, but a battle rifle it is not.
What you're looking for is a SHTF, protect the family and the homestead battle rifle. Something that will penetrate cover and do significant damage to whoever it hits. For that you need a higher caliber.
That's my 2 cents at least.
Get a barrel stamped for 5.56 NATO which will also allow you to fire 223 rem with no problems. It's not recommended to get a barrel stamped .223 and try to fire 5.56. The first choice gives you more choices in ammo variety. Personally I like COLT., I have HBar 6721 and love it. If money is no problem LWRC would be my other choice. I would also recommended checking out industry partner Thunderstick Enterprises. I was in there Monday picking up my Ruger American and they stated there may be an upcoming special or S&W MP-15 sporters or similar model.
http://www.thunderstickenterprisesonline.com/
That is correct, but if all you're doing is punching paper at an indoor range do you need to spend all that extra dough on ammo.
the OP needs to go handle and maybe shoot some to decide.
Have you thought about building? That's my plan. Seems to only save a little bit of $$..but as far as projects/DIY goes whats more badass than an AR15? Besides maybe turbocharging your car.