NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

[Apd09]

You’re supposed to see a doctor if you have an erection lasting more than 4 hours, correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And no more backpage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[teratos]

LOOPHOLE ALERT!

Thomas used the term " self defense needs" in the opinion. Who will determine what my needs are and if they warrant a permit vs what yourneeds are?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I don’t think “they” have much of an option aside from some very narrowly tailored “sensitive areas”

 

[Applehd]

62 guests... come on in... the water's fine...

 

[teratos]

62 guests... come on in... the water's fine...

It’s a little warmer since you got in…

 

[rbird7282]

I still have 3-1/2 hours to go!

Is that all? I’m thinking this will be an all day event. Going to be difficult trying to work while walking around on three legs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Apd09]

NY Governor says she prepared to make only muskets approved for carry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[camo556]

I see that the BGOS is strong in this thread.

I read the opinion "shall not be infringed"

Kavanaugh concures that the permit requirements need to be objective.

Background checks and training will be acceptable under this opinion. An "investigation" that leaves discretion in the hands of the MDSP wont be. I fail to see how interviews will pass muster under this opinion. If you have not been convicted of anything, it will be hard to deny your permit.

 

[lx1x]

62 guests... come on in... the water's fine...

You meant leftist peeping in to see the reaction in this board?

 

[jc1240]

LOOPHOLE ALERT!

Thomas used the term " self defense needs" in the opinion. Who will determine what my needs are and if they warrant a permit vs what yourneeds are?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Wouldn't that be "good and substantial" under a different name?

 

[lazarus]

I read it as also doing away with intermediate scrutiny with regards to the 2nd amendment….

Yes it does!

"Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment’s text, as informed by history. But Heller and McDonald do not support applying meansend scrutiny in the Second Amendment context. Instead, the government must affirmatively prove that its firearms regulation is part of the historical tradition that delimits the outer bounds of the right to keep and bear arms."

 

[lazarus]

NY Governor says she prepared to make only muskets approved for carry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol. Good luck. The opinion specifically calls out that HANDGUNS must be allowed for general carry outside of the home as they are a weapon IN COMMON USE. I haven't finished reading the opinion to see if anything else is termed "in common use", but it makes it really clear, anything in common use is protected and specifically enumerates handguns as one such thing.

"In sum, the Courts of Appeals’ second step is inconsistent with Heller’s historical approach and its rejection of meansend scrutiny. We reiterate that the standard for applying the Second Amendment is as follows: When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only then may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.” Konigsberg, 366 U. S., at 50, n. 10."

 

[King Chicken]

If you want to watch CNN live I think this is working

Watch CNN Live Streaming - CNN News Stream Online

Watch CNN News Live Stream. CNN News TV International Online streaming telecasting live transmission from United States of America (USA).

www.livenewsmag.com

 

[RoadDawg]

To all the naysayers…

 

[Bikebreath]

Millions like me ran to their safes to see what holsters still fit their fat asses. BOOO-YAY!

 

[Inigoes]

Snip...

The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need.

 

[ChrisD]

Lol. Good luck. The opinion specifically calls out that HANDGUNS must be allowed for general carry outside of the home as they are a weapon IN COMMON USE. I haven't finished reading the opinion to see if anything else is termed "in common use", but it makes it really clear, anything in common use is protected and specifically enumerates handguns as one such thing.

Prepare for lungs to be blown out and piled everywhere on the streets like turds in San Francisco.

 

[Stoveman]

Someone keeping an eye on Angrier Chamblee? Box wine section at her local liquor store better watch out.

 

[jc1240]

Snip...

The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need.

Would that nip in the bud any taxes/fees akin to poll taxes to exercise a right?

 

[whistlersmother]

It sounds like the held cases will be a win also.

Mag limits, AW ban - gone?

 

[ChrisD]

Someone keeping an eye on Angrier Chamblee? Box wine section at her local liquor store better watch out.

She appears to be stocked up on the Carboardeaux.