platoonDaddy
Ultimate Member
My thinking they will rule it’s a privilege vs a right.
Inconceivable.
The funny thing for me was I listened to her on audio before I knew what she looked like. And her voice and way of speaking totally matches her appearance.
This all sounds amazing for freedom , i wonder what a percentage of this being granted or won by the plaintiffs . What i read sounds like it is more possible then not .
It is hard to believe that I read this about what Roberts said today:
Is he arguing against permits?
As long as strict scrutiny it to be applied to carry laws outside the home. It's a huge win for all of us.
It will take a while to knock down unjust laws at the state levels though...
Very morbid question for those more knowledgeable about SCOTUS than I -- what if a justice dies after casting the his or her vote, but before the opinion is released? Would his or her vote still be counted?
It is hard to believe that I read this about what Roberts said today:
Is he arguing against permits?
What are the odds of a quiet per curium decision, like what happened in Caetano?
What are the odds of a quiet per curium decision, like what happened in Caetano?
What are the odds of a quiet per curium decision, like what happened in Caetano?
per curium only happen before oral argument so 0%
About the same as the odds of Maryland providing a free AR-15 to every resident.
The correct answer is that the odds are very low for a per curium decision, but they are not zero.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/opinions.aspx
They are not commonly used. While they are mostly used at the petition stage, there have been several per curium decisions in argued cases.
For some reason I have a feeling that portions Caetano will be melded with Heller and McDonald, to give us "Bear" outside of the home.