Supreme Court remits MD assault weapons ban back to lower courts in light of Bruen vs. NY ruling

[delaware_export]

that one guy sounds like he could play the judge in my cousin vinny pt 2! i hope that guy is on the dissent, because he sure ain't gonna follow bruen.

 

[motorcoachdoug]

well some very ah "choice words" were said by the judges while arguing with MSI console.

 

[Apd09]

Our attorney needs to just say “it’s clear my points will not sway you and at this time we rest and look forward to the Supreme Court reviewing the transcripts”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sleev-les]

Am I hearing correctly that he is now hinting towards states have the right to restrict based on public safety risk?

How much more clear does SCOTUS need to be with these clowns?

 

[delaware_export]

stuttering john here ... yeah. surely complete anti.

 

[delaware_export]

until scotus says IN CLEAR PLAIN ENGLISH! NO IMPLIED IDEA!!!

YOU F'd THIS CASE UP! KNOCK IT OFF!!!! and it is protected...

it will NOT be protected in anti gun states and courts

and the clear talker sounds in favor of a remand back down. to district court... TO DRAG this out.

Am I hearing correctly that he is now hinting towards states have the right to restrict based on public safety risk?

How much more clear does SCOTUS need to be with these clowns?

 

[motorcoachdoug]

and these clowns want to send it back ti district court to see if the AR-15 is in common use????

 

[delaware_export]

stuttering john is back. ok. states rights.

no gay marriage... OH!!! no states rights there...

 

[fabsroman]

I am SHOCKED that it went this route. SHOCKED I tell you. I think another 10 or 12 people might be SHOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



It just needs to get to SCOTUS or SCOTUS needs to take on some other "assault weapon" ban case and spell it out for these lower court judges in plain English.

Sending it back down to US District Court is pathetic and another waste of time. Guess they are hoping that Biden wins the election, some conservative judges retire or die, and Biden gets to appoint replacements. This is the sort of BS that is going to have me vote for Trump a third time. I had been debating whether to even vote for POTUS this time around because I think they are both buffoons, but I'll vote for Trump again to prevent this sort of buffoonery from the 4th Circuit.

 

[delaware_export]

i like clear talker guy.

 

[delaware_export]

where do law abiding, peaceful fit in to this?

well, the state wants to law to make them criminals!!!!!

 

[trickg]

Sending it back down to US District Court is pathetic and another waste of time.

That's exactly what they want.

 

[delaware_export]

this guys rebuttal time wasted on arguing THE PEOPLE!!!

went down the rabbit hole

clear talker!!! stop wasting the time on that

 

[Allen65]

It's amazing how overt some of those judges are about how they think they, and the Party State can simply ignore the plain text of a SCOTUS decision. They're not even trying to airbrush a patina of compliance on their statements.

Isn't there an appeal to SCOTUS on 4CA's denial of a PI still pending? Hopefully the transcript from today will convince 5 Justices they need to act on the PI to force a final decision from 4CA.

 

[delaware_export]

didn't scotus deal with "new tech" in caetano? and common use at 200k?

 

[motorcoachdoug]

IMHO the older judge sounds like he should not be on the bench at all. He just does not get what 2A means...

 

[delaware_export]

STUTTERING JOHN AGAIN:

this is to wipe the efforts of the md legislature off the table!!!

DAMN STRAIGHT!@

 

[Allen65]

didn't scotus deal with "new tech" in caetano? and common use at 200k?

Worst case, Bruen should fix "new tech" as something that wasn't in existence when Bruen was decided. Nothing on MD's ban list was not in existence at the time of Bruen, except for the couple of guns that never were produced in the first place.

Not that "new tech" should be an issue at all....because that pushes us back into tiers of scrutiny, which SCOTUS specifically banned when 2A is implicated.

 

[fabsroman]

IMHO the older judge sounds like he should not be on the bench at all. He just does not get what 2A means...

The judges and politicians do NOT want to recognize that the 2A is to provide a means for The People to REVOLT and overthrow a tyrannical government. It is supposed to provide the means for revisiting 1776.

Problem is that the populace itself has gotten comfortable, fat, and lazy, and cannot even contemplate going against a government that "provides for us".

 

[motorcoachdoug]

Well that was some fireworks show for sure!!!!