delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,267
that one guy sounds like he could play the judge in my cousin vinny pt 2! i hope that guy is on the dissent, because he sure ain't gonna follow bruen.
Am I hearing correctly that he is now hinting towards states have the right to restrict based on public safety risk?
How much more clear does SCOTUS need to be with these clowns?
That's exactly what they want.Sending it back down to US District Court is pathetic and another waste of time.
Worst case, Bruen should fix "new tech" as something that wasn't in existence when Bruen was decided. Nothing on MD's ban list was not in existence at the time of Bruen, except for the couple of guns that never were produced in the first place.didn't scotus deal with "new tech" in caetano? and common use at 200k?
The judges and politicians do NOT want to recognize that the 2A is to provide a means for The People to REVOLT and overthrow a tyrannical government. It is supposed to provide the means for revisiting 1776.IMHO the older judge sounds like he should not be on the bench at all. He just does not get what 2A means...