Well, you're my favorite MDS member.Yes.
But every time he says or writes "your favorite President, me!" he has me in stitches.
Well, you're my favorite MDS member.Yes.
But every time he says or writes "your favorite President, me!" he has me in stitches.
The DOJ you admire thought otherwise. So the State decided to proceed to prosecute for a Federal "crime."So yeah admitting to committing a crime should remain private… cute
I just don’t think he is an a-hole. He gets asked a-hole questions that only can be answered with a-hole answers. Let’s see how loved he is when he gets asked, what’s your favorite color, or what ice cream flavor did you order sir? Nah, he gets BS questions all inferring he’s a racist, or a narcacist, etc.Sorry, but it's way more than "brianless sheep" that think Trump is an a-hole. WAAYYYY more. Hell, some people even like him for that very reason.
He IS a raging a-hole. It's part of his schtick.
But he is my favorite President and if he isn’t your favorite President, then obviously he isn’t talking to you.Yes.
But every time he says or writes "your favorite President, me!" he has me in stitches.
The only president I’ve ever heard saying he committed a crime was then Vice President Joe Biden.The DOJ you admire thought otherwise. So the State decided to proceed to prosecute for a Federal "crime."
I have a problem with that.
So should you.
Trump screwed us with the ATF and their new machine gun regulation (that violates the law) to get rid of bump stocks.So you don't trust Trump more than you want to protect your and my Second Amendment rights, because not voting for the most pro gun candidate that has a chance to win makes it easier for an anti gun democrat to cheat their way into the White House. Virtue signaling may make someone feel good but it does little to protect our rights. Under our political system the the only thing that works is to Hold your nose and vote for the candidate who most closely matches your political desires (no one will be an exact match) who has a chance to win.
Not really. Might want to go back and look for yourself, or are you going to believe the media’s propaganda. Reagan did give up the full autos, not a big deal to most gun owners as the prices were out of reach for most anyway, but that was to appease the Brady Bunch which was out for blood. Full autos were a sacrifice, similar to Trumps red flag and bump stock stand.Reagan was bad for guns...
Well, technically he didn't do it but he did put people in place who did.Trump made shall issue the law of the land and reversed Roe v Wade, something every other Republican has blown smoke about for decades.
His “bump stock stand” was indeed a maneuver to defang a much worse legislative prospect. But aside from a moment or two of musing out loud about crazy people with guns, he and his administration took NO position or action of any kind on red flag laws. That became a state thing, he didn’t touch it with a ten foot poll, pole, or poal.similar to Trumps red flag and bump stock stand.
Much worse legislative prospect?His “bump stock stand” was indeed a maneuver to defang a much worse legislative prospect. But aside from a moment or two of musing out loud about crazy people with guns, he and his administration took NO position or action of any kind on red flag laws. That became a state thing, he didn’t touch it with a ten foot poll, pole, or poal.
There was overwhelming support in both houses of congress in the immediate wake of the Parkland/Vegas mass killings. The portion that was coming from the highly pressured GOP collapsed immediately when that piece was preemptively ripped away as a focus for it. The lefties were furious they couldn’t finally have their AWB back again.Much worse legislative prospect?
He was the president and could have vetoed that prospect.
TED NUGENT!!!!!!The most perfect 2nd Amendment candidate out there is worth nothing if they can't get elected.
The name of the game is who is the best 2nd Amendment candidate running who has a chance of getting elected?
I am waiting to hear your suggestions everyone. Please post their poll numbers with your suggestions.
They have to be able to win or the ship of state and the 2nd Amendment is going to sink.
He did do it. He used the same magic wand you think he could’ve for national reciprocity.Well, technically he didn't do it but he did put people in place who did.
I will give him that.
Still, I'm not relying on him to be pro-gun.
I would possibly rely on the people he appointed.
Sounds like you watch a lot of CNN.
There’s your problem. The Drudge site was bought by and is now run by standard issue lefties putting a hard Dem slant on things.These days, most of my news comes from Drudge links or what I chose to search out using google or yahoo news.
In fairness , he crude , rude , and joyously abrasive . But that's not a disqualification . So was Jackson , and Trump mostly directs at those who deserve it .I don’t think he’s flaming ahole at all,
You could just cut all the Drama and admit you want 4 more years of Pee Pads and Knee Pads instead of pretending to be on the right while repeating every talking point the left publishes about Trump
Much worse legislative prospect?
He was the president and could have vetoed that prospect.