- Jan 30, 2013
- 34,306
Fixed it for her.Sad... NY Gov Hokum saying, "They have removed our right to unreasonable restrictions"??!
Idiot.
Asked for comment, President Brandon replied, "Frimerkksvbitm."
Fixed it for her.Sad... NY Gov Hokum saying, "They have removed our right to unreasonable restrictions"??!
Idiot.
Mustache boy has already come out and said nothing will be changed in MD until he reads the decision.I agree. I just texted somebody that the first person denied a CCW in Maryland because of a lack of good and substantial should file suit immediately. He was asking if Hogan will change the requirement overnight. Told him that Hogan should. He think that Hogan will drag his feet. Personally, I think this gives Hogan a reason to change it overnight and I am guessing, based upon Hogan's relaxation of CCW requirements for business owners, that Hogan wants to change it overnight. We shall see what Hogan does.
So at this point if you have never applied, just do the 16 hour training, then apply minus G&S?A good and substantial reason is no longer a reason to deny your CCW.
My guess is that licensing is the next thing to be litigated. Should people have to pay money and be licensed to exercise a Constitutional Right? CCW, HQL. Wish they would do away with both licensing schemes that are barriers to exercising one's Right.
I agree with this.How can Maryland still require a HQL to purchase an item which is, by SCOTUS ruling, that person’s COTUS right to carry?
Bye bye 2013. Bye bye HQL.
SCOTUS rule just obliterated the logic behind the HQL.Hasn’t the HQL already been challenged and it held up? Maybe that was in the state court so this fed ruling changes things?
Yes.So at this point if you have never applied, just do the 16 hour training, then apply minus G&S?
I went down this path before, was a PITA. This was like 10 years ago, forget what exactly happened, but there was a mad rush to get CCW, ultimately the rug got pulled out from underneath us. Hopefully, this time it's for real.Ok - so what does this mean for us Marylanders. Can I now apply and get a CCW?
This was a SCOTUS decision. Not reversible, no appeal. It’s real.I went down this path before, was a PITA. This was like 10 years ago, forget what exactly happened, but there was a mad rush to get CCW, ultimately the rug got pulled out from underneath us. Hopefully, this time it's for real.
My application is ready. I just need prints. I’ll get those Tuesday.
They do livescan?I'm with ya. I may get my prints tomorrow up at the sheriff's office
They do livescan?
HQL was upheld in the US District Court of Maryland. I was there for the oral arguments. However, the US District Court Judge relied on intermediate scrutiny to justify the decision and the state's ability to regulate the 2nd Amendment. Bruen now says that strict scrutiny and intermediate scrutiny are not to be used. The argument on the HQL was whether strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny should be used by the Court. Now, SCOTUS is saying neither should be used. There is no second test to be used to determine if a state should be allowed to limit a Constitutional Right.Hasn’t the HQL already been challenged and it held up? Maybe that was in the state court so this fed ruling changes things?
Yep...they have been expecting this and have been crafting clever ways to make sure the average person either cannot afford a permit or find the regulations for compliance so cumbersome or hard to comply with that they don't bother.Great news!
But the pessimist in me thinks the powers that be in MD. are scrutinizing the ruling to find ways to make getting a CCW in Maryland as cumbersome and difficult as possible.
I hope I'm wrong.
How the heck are they going to grant a stay on the decision so that both sides can decide whether to appeal? An appeal to where? God almighty?I went down this path before, was a PITA. This was like 10 years ago, forget what exactly happened, but there was a mad rush to get CCW, ultimately the rug got pulled out from underneath us. Hopefully, this time it's for real.
Yes. Thank you President Trump.As someone once said, "Elections have consequences..."
We won!
What's outrageous is that, in a state with one of the most violent shit hole cities in the country, an elected leader would actively stand against their citizen's right to self defense.
Well saidWhat's outrageous is that, in a state with one of the most violent shit hole cities in the country, an elected leader would actively stand against their citizen's right to self defense.
F her, and those like her.